Teams

CDTA S M18&OX7.0 5.Forest View Korczak Sun 11 $23

CDTA 1Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesAmy Byrne / Eric Yeh vs Elise Bergman / Douglas Kelley6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Katie Marchewka / Mark Swantek6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelly Couris / Mike Herlihy vs Sherry Polachek / Matthew Miedona6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSteven Dayon / Meg LaMonica vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Erika Matsumoto3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Byrne / Eric Yeh vs Yuki Iwanari / Tomoko Hayashida6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Jim Lakely vs Yasukazu Nagatake / Natsuki Yamamoto6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Bonny Tovar / Carlos del Moral3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Jim Lakely vs Diana Atad / Young Choi6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Couris / Daniel Korczak vs Brian Atad / Catie Hughes1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKelly Couris / Jim Lakely vs Debbie Schaefer / Brandon Istad4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Byrne / Mike Herlihy vs Ariel Cantieri / John Ohrlund7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Catie Hughes / Rod Ganesan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGregory Morin / Alicia Ballesteros vs Diana Atad / Young Choi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Sherry Polachek / Daniel Michael6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Couris / Mike Herlihy vs Rachel Fuller / Andy Gould7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Byrne / Mandar Bankhele vs Laura Cherry / Mark Swantek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Brandon Istad / Barbara Chmieleski4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Couris / Mike Herlihy vs Jeanne Trowbridge / Matt Trowbridge6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Yuki Iwanari / Tomoko Hayashida4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJim Lakely / Alicia Ballesteros vs Akihiro Okumura / Kotomi Moran7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&OX7.0 6.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $237118618168
2CDTA S M18&OX7.0 5.Forest View Korczak Sun 11 $236217720180
3CDTA S M18&OX7.0 4.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 3 $2044141021166
4CDTA S M18&OX7.0 1.MT Chi Bergman Sat 6 $302671738257
5CDTA S M18&OX7.0 2.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $231742042270
6DROPPED - CDTA S M18&OX7.0 3.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $26000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Alicia Ballesteros
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.91
Kelly Couris
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Amy Byrne
published 4
3.39
Eric Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Steven Dayon
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.19
Meg LaMonica
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.17
Mike Herlihy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Mandar Bankhele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Jim Lakely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Daniel Korczak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregory Morin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Morin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Yeh + Alicia Ballesteros7071% games+15.0% vs expected
Meg LaMonica + Steven Dayon292153% games+11.2% vs expected
Jim Lakely + Alicia Ballesteros10259% games−0.9% vs expected
Patricia Morin + Gregory Morin11337% gamesnot enough data
Mike Herlihy + Kelly Couris314 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Morin + Mike Herlihy123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Yeh + Amy Byrne123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicia Ballesteros
59W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Kelly Couris
90W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Amy Byrne
55W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Eric Yeh
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Steven Dayon
73W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Meg LaMonica
89W–94L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Mike Herlihy
68W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Mandar Bankhele
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Jim Lakely
45W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Daniel Korczak
46W–52L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Gregory Morin
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Morin
14W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.