Teams

CDTA S M18&OX7.0 1.MT Chi Bergman Sat 6 $30

CDTA 1Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer

22 players · average NTRP 3.54 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesElise Bergman / Douglas Kelley vs Amy Byrne / Eric Yeh3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Marchewka / Mark Swantek vs Meg LaMonica / Steven Dayon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSherry Polachek / Matthew Miedona vs Kelly Couris / Mike Herlihy0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesElise Bergman / Collin Moore vs Hideaki Takahashi / Mio Dahlquist2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Swanson / Douglas Kelley vs Kenta Oikawa / Tomoko Hayashida6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Ramker / Andy Gould vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Erika Matsumoto3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKatie Marchewka / Douglas Kelley vs Illana Hodges / Joel McVey1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Fuller / Andy Gould vs Annalisa Tsai / Brian Atad6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Baker / Eshwar Sankar vs Sarah Terry / Louie Gonzalez6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAnna Swanson / Collin Moore vs Debbie Schaefer / Brandon Istad7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Fuller / Mark Swantek vs Jeanne Trowbridge / Matt Trowbridge5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLyndsay Cavanagh / Naresh Koka vs Ariel Cantieri / Jonathan Berggren4-6, 1-4
W#1 DoublesAnna Swanson / Douglas Kelley vs Ariel Cantieri / Jonathan Berggren7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesLyndsay Cavanagh / Eshwar Sankar vs Joan Cooney / John Ohrlund7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJamie Burns / Matthew Miedona vs Barbara Chmieleski / Matt Trowbridge4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSherry Polachek / Daniel Michael vs Meg LaMonica / Steven Dayon4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Fuller / Andy Gould vs Kelly Couris / Mike Herlihy7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Cherry / Mark Swantek vs Amy Byrne / Mandar Bankhele3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAnna Swanson / Daniel Michael vs Yasukazu Nagatake / Yukiko Juretic0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElise Bergman / Collin Moore vs Kenta Oikawa / Erika Matsumoto5-7, 4-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJamie Burns / Mark Swantek vs Karn Sri / Tomoko Hayashida2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Marchewka / Douglas Kelley vs Illana Hodges / John Kim2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Ramker / Peter Daher vs Michelle Parks / Matthew Arceo0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&OX7.0 6.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $237118618168
2CDTA S M18&OX7.0 5.Forest View Korczak Sun 11 $236217720180
3CDTA S M18&OX7.0 4.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 3 $2044141021166
4CDTA S M18&OX7.0 1.MT Chi Bergman Sat 6 $302671738257
5CDTA S M18&OX7.0 2.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $231742042270
6DROPPED - CDTA S M18&OX7.0 3.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $26000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Michael
published 4
3.67
Douglas Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Collin Moore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Michelle Ramker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Lyndsay Cavanagh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Sherry Polachek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Mark Swantek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Eshwar Sankar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Jamie Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Andy Gould
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Elise Bergman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Rachel Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Laura Cherry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Abby Ross
published 3.5
3.13
Anna Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Naresh Koka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Katie Marchewka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Beth Garino
published
Erin Baker
published
Matthew Miedona
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Daher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
RYan Garino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elise Bergman + Collin Moore71052% games+3.5% vs expected
Sherry Polachek + Matthew Miedona3342% gamesnot enough data
Mark Swantek + Katie Marchewka2348% gamesnot enough data
Andy Gould + Rachel Fuller314 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Burns + Andy Gould123 matchesnot enough data
Anna Swanson + Collin Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Polachek + Andy Gould213 matchesnot enough data
Andy Gould + Abby Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Michael
25W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Douglas Kelley
44W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Collin Moore
21W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Michelle Ramker
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Lyndsay Cavanagh
124W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Sherry Polachek
138W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Mark Swantek
29W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Eshwar Sankar
41W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Jamie Burns
60W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Andy Gould
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Elise Bergman
70W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Rachel Fuller
43W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.23
Laura Cherry
56W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Abby Ross
29W–38L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Anna Swanson
76W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Naresh Koka
44W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
3
Katie Marchewka
36W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Beth Garino
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erin Baker
25W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Miedona
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Daher
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
RYan Garino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.