Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Natalie

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-21vs OC Great Park Irvine - Debra - 9Won 30
W#1 SinglesNatalie Croswell vs Selina Mansonhing6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Abdelmuti / Natalie McDaniel vs Gina Moore / Roya Khairzada2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdyn Elliott-Barber / Michelle Greenhaw vs Weimin Sun / Darlene Anievas6-3, 6-1
2025-01-17vs OC Eldorado TC - Lisa -930Won 31
W#1 DoublesNatalie Croswell / Erin Nichols vs Jennifer Paz / Laura Karich4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDina Randazzo vs Denise Vo4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSara van Dusen / Michelle Greenhaw vs Jackie Betraun / Abby Oppliger1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllyson Moser / Natalie McDaniel vs Desiree Masi / Kristine Hammond6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Allyson Moser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Michelle Greenhaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Carmen Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Natalie McDaniel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Kimberly Abdelmuti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Hongmei Cui
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Edyn Elliott-Barber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Natalie Croswell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.72
Michelle Schmit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dina Randazzo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jacqueline Luther
published
Sara van Dusen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie McDaniel + Kimberly Abdelmuti5160% games+12.0% vs expected
Michelle Greenhaw + Hongmei Cui213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allyson Moser
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Michelle Greenhaw
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carmen Johnson
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Natalie McDaniel
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kimberly Abdelmuti
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Hongmei Cui
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Edyn Elliott-Barber
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Natalie Croswell
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Michelle Schmit
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Dina Randazzo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jacqueline Luther
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara van Dusen
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.