Teams

OC Eldorado TC - Lisa -930

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

19 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-01vs OC Great Park Irvine - Debra - 9Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAbby Oppliger / Mary Franz vs Khanh Vu / Jackie Hower7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracey Jacobsen / Dana Shanahan vs Jennifer Xu / Annie Huang6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Lauriano / Eileen Asahi vs Roya Khairzada / Weimin Sun2-6, 2-6
2025-03-28vs OC Newport Beach TC - Kim/KatyaWon 31
W#1 DoublesAbby Oppliger / Jackie Betraun vs Elizabeth Warner / Chrissy Nordheim6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristine Hammond vs Joy Davis2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Conkle / Eileen Asahi vs MEGAN VILLANUEVA / Kim Mishow6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnita Huang / Tracey Jacobsen vs Katherine Rennert / Ashley Rose2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-21vs OC YLCC - MelissaLost 04
L#1 DoublesBridget Conkle / Peggy Knopf vs Melissa McCullough / Michaela Ehrle3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDandan Zhang vs Mischa King1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Oppliger / Jackie Betraun vs Nancy Phillipi / Joy Skillman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Shanahan / Mary Franz vs Monica Kirby / Leslie Acevedo6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-17vs OC The Huntington Club - NatalieLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Paz / Laura Karich vs Natalie Croswell / Erin Nichols6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDenise Vo vs Dina Randazzo6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Betraun / Abby Oppliger vs Sara van Dusen / Michelle Greenhaw6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDesiree Masi / Kristine Hammond vs Allyson Moser / Natalie McDaniel3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Shea
published 3.5
Jan Amren
published 3.5
3.22
Peggy Knopf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Laura Karich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Tracey Jacobsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Dana Shanahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Abby Oppliger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Jackie Betraun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Paz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Anita Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Cheryl Hansberry
published 3.5
3.02
Denise Vo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Bridget Conkle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Desiree Masi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Lisa Lauriano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Eileen Asahi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dandan Zhang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Kristine Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mary Franz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Karich + Jennifer Paz2444% games+2.1% vs expected
Abby Oppliger + Jackie Betraun2646% games−0.1% vs expected
Bridget Conkle + Eileen Asahi2344% gamesnot enough data
Bridget Conkle + Peggy Knopf033 matchesnot enough data
Abby Oppliger + Jennifer Paz213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Shanahan + Tracey Jacobsen033 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Jacobsen + Desiree Masi123 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Jacobsen + Anita Huang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudia Shea
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jan Amren
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Knopf
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Laura Karich
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Tracey Jacobsen
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dana Shanahan
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Abby Oppliger
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jackie Betraun
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Paz
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Anita Huang
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Cheryl Hansberry
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Denise Vo
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Bridget Conkle
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Desiree Masi
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Lisa Lauriano
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.79
3
Eileen Asahi
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dandan Zhang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Hammond
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Franz
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.