Teams

OC Newport Beach TC - Kim/Katya

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-28vs OC Eldorado TC - Lisa -930Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Warner / Chrissy Nordheim vs Abby Oppliger / Jackie Betraun1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMEGAN VILLANUEVA / Kim Mishow vs Bridget Conkle / Eileen Asahi4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Rennert / Ashley Rose vs Anita Huang / Tracey Jacobsen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-28vs OC Fullerton TC - Masako 10amLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Smith / Stacie Scifres vs Nicole Festini / Keiko Jun3-6, 1-4
2025-01-31vs OC YLCC - MelissaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Smith / Stacie Scifres vs Kim Byrens / Melissa McCullough6-3, 6-4
2025-01-24vs OC The Huntington Club - NatalieWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Smith / Stacie Scifres vs Carmen Johnson / Natalie Croswell6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Stacie Scifres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Heather Rezner
published
3.37
Elizabeth Warner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Rose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Kimberly Gambol
published
3.18
Joy Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Gemma Snell
published
3.06
Chrissy Nordheim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
MEGAN VILLANUEVA
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Katherine Rennert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Lacy Alyn
published
Christine Lisko
published 3
Kim Mishow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Naughton
published
Shandon Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shandon Smith + Kimberly Gambol2347% games+3.4% vs expected
Katherine Rennert + Ashley Rose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacie Scifres
51W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Heather Rezner
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Elizabeth Warner
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Ashley Rose
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Gambol
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Joy Davis
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Gemma Snell
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
3
Chrissy Nordheim
15W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
MEGAN VILLANUEVA
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Katherine Rennert
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
Lacy Alyn
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Christine Lisko
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Mishow
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Naughton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shandon Smith
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.