Teams

OC Fullerton TC - Masako 10am

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-21vs OC Eldorado TC - Lisa -930Won 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Fehr / Helen Garner vs Kristine Hammond / Cheryl Hansberry6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Garner / Irene Fehr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-28vs OC Newport Beach TC - Kim/KatyaLost 01
L#3 DoublesHelen Garner / Sandi Goldstein vs Kimberly Gambol / Elizabeth Warner2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesIrene Fehr / Helen Garner vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Annie Clark4-6, 5-7
2025-01-10vs OC Los Cab - Sherrie - 10Won 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Fehr / Helen Garner vs Maureen Conter / Gilda Banta6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Patricia Santiago
published
3.49
Azin Mirchi
published 4
3.47
KAORI MINAGI
published
3.47
Nicole Festini
published
3.35
Keiko Jun
published
3.34
Nancy Bergman
published
3.31
Irene Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
Helen Garner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Annette Tran
published 3.5
2.90
Robin Briggs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Sandi Goldstein
published
2.73
Angela DeCuir
published 3
Masako Sato
published
Yoneko Buritica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Fehr + Helen Garner4354% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Bergman + Keiko Jun404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Azin Mirchi
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
KAORI MINAGI
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Keiko Jun
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Nancy Bergman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Helen Garner
46W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Annette Tran
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Robin Briggs
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Sandi Goldstein
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Angela DeCuir
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Masako Sato
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yoneko Buritica
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.