Teams

Sa.Park18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-05vs De.Lape18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Allyson Schneider vs Christina Aldereguia / Tatiana Nevmyrych6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachael Kiker / Merri Metcalf vs Amber Cagle / Lori Jensen6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Park / Claire Little vs Jennifer Roche / Sara Velarde6-3, 6-3
2024-09-28vs Na.Rodrigues18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Little / Rachael Kiker vs Denise Decandia / Sapna Varkey6-4, 6-3
2024-09-21vs Em.Cutts18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura McNiven / Karen Reynders vs Kathryn Lawn / Tiffany Barrier3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Pack / Claire Little vs Lindsey Klein / Ashlie Adams6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRachael Kiker / Brenda Li vs Laura Capps / Julie Kelly6-2, 6-2
2024-09-15vs Pa.Hankerson18C7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesRachael Kiker / Anna Bentley vs Leigh Breischaft / Paulina Powierza1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Ross / Allyson Schneider vs Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Elizabeth Taylor6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Pack / Claire Little vs Pamela Hankerson / Keisha Price6-2, 6-1
2024-09-14vs Sh.Littleton18C7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura McNiven / Sandra Park vs Erin Farleigh / Hilary Tew6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Davidson / Claire Little vs Julie Dougherty / Shannon Littleton6-2, 6-3
2024-08-31vs De.Lape18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesRachael Kiker / Merri Metcalf vs Button Hall / Sara Velarde6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Schwartz / Claire Little vs Kylie Griep / Christine Rowe6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-24vs Na.Rodrigues18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura McNiven / Allyson Schneider vs Lisa Griffin / Lindsay Murdock4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLi Zhuang / Merri Metcalf vs Kendra McAdory / Andrea Klinefelter2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Pa.Hankerson18C7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura McNiven / Merri Metcalf vs Helen Zhang / Ashley McRae7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Pack / Brenda Li vs Kelsey Kowalski / Paulina Powierza6-7, 3-6
2024-08-17vs Em.Cutts18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura McNiven / Karen Reynders vs Kathryn Lawn / Tiffany Barrier7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachael Kiker / Brenda Li vs Amanda Lindsay / Laura Capps6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Pack / Claire Little vs Lindsey Klein / Julie Kelly6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-10vs Sh.Littleton18C7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Karen Reynders vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Hilary Tew6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachael Kiker / Amy Rogers vs Katelyn Applegate / Donna Misa4-6, 4-4
W#3 DoublesLi Zhuang / Anna Bentley vs Keshia Green / Shannon Littleton6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Rachael Kiker
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.85
Laura McNiven
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.75
Li Zhuang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Heidi Ross
published 4
3.61
Anna Bentley
published 4
3.60
Sandra Park
published
3.59
Merri Metcalf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Claire Little
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.49
Karen Reynders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Allyson Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Reynders + Brenda Li23759% games−0.3% vs expected
Nancy Pack + Laura McNiven39962% games−0.6% vs expected
Nancy Pack + Karen Reynders6073% gamesnot enough data
Merri Metcalf + Rachael Kiker4261% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Pack + Claire Little3256% gamesnot enough data
Merri Metcalf + Claire Little303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Reynders + Rachael Kiker213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Reynders + Laura McNiven213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Rachael Kiker
164W–91L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Laura McNiven
352W–122L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Li Zhuang
74W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Heidi Ross
55W–38L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Anna Bentley
13W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.61
Sandra Park
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Merri Metcalf
310W–173L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Brenda Li
278W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Claire Little
137W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Karen Reynders
238W–142L career · 3 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Allyson Schneider
292W–173L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.