← Search

Laura McNiven

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
642 matches · 473W–169L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history642 matches
L
2026-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Pack championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · ACP.Rider · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · Ch.Higgins40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Petty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · Ki.Patrey18C8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Graves
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · ACP.Rider · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Smita Paranjape
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-05 · TOC.Graves · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Graves
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-28 · Ch.Higgins40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nora Lenahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-27 · Ki.Patrey18C8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Pack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · TOC.Graves · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ramona Holdstock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Childs championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Murdock championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-14 · Ch.Higgins40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Graves
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams138 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 68.8% of games
3.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 61.5% of games
3.5
78.4%
69W–19L · 62.7% of games
4.0
81.1%
137W–32L · 61.6% of games
4.5
47.5%
29W–32L · 48% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.9% of games
6.5
71.7%
38W–15L · 60.2% of games
7.5
75.9%
60W–19L · 58.7% of games
8.5
50%
28W–28L · 50.1% of games
4.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.5% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 73% of games
8.0mixed
85.3%
29W–5L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
309 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
174 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
127 matches
#1 Singles
2%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert