← Search

Melissa DeLorme

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 134W–59L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Biringer championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Biringer championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Biringer championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Biringer championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mallory Biringer championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mallory Biringer championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mallory Biringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-07 · Me.Delorme18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Clare Rosemeyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Je.McIntyre18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Virginia Griffin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-24 · TOC.Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathie Stronach
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Clare Rosemeyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Risinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 67.5% of games
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.6% of games
4.0
74.7%
56W–19L · 60% of games
4.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.7% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 77.1% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.8% of games
7.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 62% of games
8.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 54.3% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams