Teams

SFV LLW - Northridge Quakes - Alan Esguerra

2024 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-17vs SFV - Porter Valley 4.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesSunny Trinh / Renaldo Goncalves vs Shane Duffy / Jeff Bailes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGiancarlo Bertumen / Aris Reyes vs Jaskaran Singh / Rob Stanfield6-3, 6-3
2024-11-09vs SFV - AV StormersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGiancarlo Bertumen / Phillip Nguyen vs Brad Bixel / Adam Olejniczak6-0, 6-0
2024-11-09vs SFV - AV StormersWon 20
W#1 DoublesSunny Trinh / Coby Zyskind vs Ray del Rosario / Carlos Guarin6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGiancarlo Bertumen / Phillip Nguyen vs Brad Bixel / Adam Olejniczak6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alan Esguerra
published 4.5
4.18
Leonardo Kim
published
4.13
Giancarlo Bertumen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
4.03
John Nario
published
4.02
Nick Litvinov
published
3.97
Sunny Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Renaldo Goncalves
published
3.94
Michael Tan
published
3.92
Marcus Liou
published
3.86
Tunde Alele
published
3.86
Scott Conroy
published
Aris Reyes
published 4
3.67
Steve Oetomo
published
3.65
Nicholas Araujo
published
Coby Zyskind
published
Randy Tran
published
Rogel Sardea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Tan + John Nario224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alan Esguerra
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Giancarlo Bertumen
129W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
John Nario
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.03
Nick Litvinov
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Sunny Trinh
146W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
Renaldo Goncalves
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
Michael Tan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Marcus Liou
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.92
Tunde Alele
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
Scott Conroy
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Aris Reyes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Nicholas Araujo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Coby Zyskind
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Tran
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rogel Sardea
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.