Teams

UPTA18C/Russell/Kroc

2025 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Men - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-16vs UPTA18C/Meredith/ACACLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Dickey / Chris Helms vs Garret Conover / Nils Mollenkamp2-6, 3-6
2025-09-13vs UPTA18C/Heyde/Neely FarmLost 12
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Samuel Moretz Chapman vs Jeff Greenstreet / Ronald Bailey2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNathaniel Futral / Patrick OFriel vs Matthew Joseph / Jeff Warren1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosh Dale / Sidney Key vs Henry Oleary / Wayne Krause4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Combo Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Samuel Moretz Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Chris Helms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Drew Corontzes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Peter Elbaum
published
3.61
Patrick OFriel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Jonathan Shoultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Sidney Key
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Dennis Gillan
published 3.5
3.31
Nathaniel Futral
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Scott Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Josh Dale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Erik Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Russell + Nathaniel Futral4352% games+11.4% vs expected
Erik Russell + Sidney Key1544% games+9.3% vs expected
Scott Dickey + Erik Russell044 matchesnot enough data
Scott Dickey + Chris Helms033 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Gillan + Erik Russell123 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Gillan + Nathaniel Futral303 matchesnot enough data
Patrick OFriel + Nathaniel Futral213 matchesnot enough data
Erik Russell + Jonathan Shoultz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Moretz Chapman
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Chris Helms
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Drew Corontzes
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Peter Elbaum
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Patrick OFriel
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
Jonathan Shoultz
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Sidney Key
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Dennis Gillan
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Nathaniel Futral
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Scott Dickey
8W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Josh Dale
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Erik Russell
11W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.