Teams

KY/LEX/Simonsen-Ernst 3.5

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-01vs KY/LEX/Morrow/PerniceLost 04
L#1 DoublesKatina Swansegar / Rhonda Hilton vs Cynthia Yeiser / Catherine Richmond4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Sarah Stykes5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMeghan Simonsen / Yvonne Conner vs Teela Watts / Laura Singler5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandi Simon / Krista Mullins vs Jennifer Strange / Cathy Crutchfield7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-23vs KY/LEX/Morrow/PerniceLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllyssa Kilanowski / Yvonne Conner vs Lucy Butt / Ruth Anna Swacker2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKrista Mullins / Regina Covington vs Teela Watts / Catherine Richmond6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLisa Price vs Callie Manor1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Rhonda Hilton vs Sarah Stykes / Sara Grau1-6, 0-6
2025-02-19vs KY/LEX/SENTERS/KNIGHTLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaria del Mar Landron / Meghan Simonsen vs Kirsten van Haaren / Lisa Castle5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Deaton / Angie Cobb vs Doris Senters / Melinda McClain4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristi Martin vs Mily Ralsten6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAya Tsuchiya / Yvonne Conner vs Cathy Corales / Kenda Moore6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs KY/LEX/SENTERS/KNIGHTLost 13
L#1 DoublesAya Tsuchiya / Jennifer Ernst vs Doris Senters / Kirsten van Haaren3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Laurie DeVore6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Kristi Martin vs Linn Jefferson / Margaret de Movellan0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatina Swansegar / Krista Mullins vs Carmen Ignat / Jennifer Wilson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Catherine McDoniel
published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Deaton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Maria del Mar Landron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Katina Swansegar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Allyssa Kilanowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Meghan Simonsen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Yvonne Conner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.15
Lisa Price
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.12
Aya Tsuchiya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.12
Angie Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Brandi Simon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Regina Covington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kristi Martin
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Krista Mullins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katina Swansegar + Rhonda Hilton2348% games+2.9% vs expected
Maria del Mar Landron + Meghan Simonsen1742% games−5.9% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Angie Cobb + Lisa Deaton224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Deaton + Meghan Simonsen134 matchesnot enough data
Olive Gallagher + Aya Tsuchiya314 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Hilton + Aya Tsuchiya224 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Simonsen + Allyssa Kilanowski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine McDoniel
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lisa Deaton
7W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Maria del Mar Landron
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Katina Swansegar
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allyssa Kilanowski
13W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Meghan Simonsen
12W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Lisa Price
17W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Aya Tsuchiya
44W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Angie Cobb
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brandi Simon
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kristi Martin
33W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Krista Mullins
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.