Teams

Choy

2026 18&Over Men Manhattan · 4.5 Men

22 players · average NTRP 4.38 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-08vs The RookiesWon 41
W#1 DoublesAnanth Mohan / Randall Weber-Levine vs Patrick Tsai / Julian Yarmouth6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatthew Sachs vs Justin Zhang2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lomelin / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN vs Atul Singh / Jason Misner6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAndrew Murano vs Max Carle6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyle Arnold / Christopher Durrang vs Matthew Genser / Alex Du4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-28vs AbellWon 31
L#1 DoublesMatthew Sachs / Bryan Chu vs Andrew Abell / Spencer Koh6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Jake Bowling3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Arnold / Arthur Hainline vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoshua Ong / Gaurav Chandra vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-14vs Low/MoramarcoWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Durrang / Seth Pamperin vs Robert Moynihan / Serge Verdoux2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Romain Frizol6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Seiden / Bryan Chu vs Brian Untch / Shin Kang6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-07vs Metro: TomasiniLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Dong / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN vs Nikola Djordjevic / JORGE GODOY GOMIS3-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs The RookiesWon 32
L#1 DoublesKilby Featherston / Michael Trainer vs Timothy Duong / Eric Wang7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Julian Yarmouth6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMatthew Seiden / Bryan Chu vs Claudio Contreras Garcia / Gerardo Valenzuela6-3, 5-4
L#2 SinglesChristopher Durrang vs Ringo Cheung2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN / Geoffrey Brennan vs Matthew Genser / Alex Du6-3, 5-7
2026-05-26vs Metro: Papi's PawnsWon 32
W#1 DoublesRandall Weber-Levine / Seth Pamperin vs James Aiken / Edwin Zhang5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Varun Srinivasan6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN / Kyle Arnold vs Teppei Suzuki / Jesse Kallins1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Bahrom Matyakubov6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Durrang / Harlan Strader vs Trace Davis / Lawrence Wang5-7, 2-6
2026-05-17vs AbellWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnanth Mohan / Randall Weber-Levine vs Matthew Godlewski / Spencer Koh6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAndrew Murano vs Michael van Dusen6-7, 3-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Seiden / Bryan Chu vs Andrew Abell / Alexander Perry4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-12vs DiChiara/OwenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Lindberg / Matthew Sachs vs Gerald Dichiara / Wade Tucker6-4, 6-4
2026-05-07vs Wong/JordanWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnanth Mohan / Randall Weber-Levine vs Sam Gnesin / Tim Wildin6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Justin Lansinger6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFlint Christian / Brian DeCorte vs Nicholas Bolger / William Loh4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesArthur Hainline vs Thomas Lodge5-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesGRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN / Michael Trainer vs Andrew Kelley / Maxwell Payson6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs RomanoWon 30
W#1 SinglesRyan Casserly vs Carson Braun6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Andrew Sennett2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFlint Christian / Michael Trainer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Andrew Murano
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Bryan Chu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Ryan Casserly
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
4.26
Randall Weber-Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Lomelin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Brian DeCorte
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Christopher Durrang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Ananth Mohan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Seth Pamperin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Arthur Hainline
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
Matthew Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Gaurav Chandra
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.80
Kyle Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Matthew Seiden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Joshua Ong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Trainer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Geoffrey Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Alvin Choy
published 3.5
Flint Christian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Harlan Strader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kilby Featherston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randall Weber-Levine + Ananth Mohan314 matchesnot enough data
Arthur Hainline + Andrew Murano123 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Arnold + GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN123 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Durrang + Geoffrey Brennan303 matchesnot enough data
Kilby Featherston + Michael Trainer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Murano
5W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Bryan Chu
4W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
Ryan Casserly
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
Randall Weber-Levine
30W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Daniel Lomelin
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Brian DeCorte
58W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
47W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Christopher Durrang
35W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
4.5
Ananth Mohan
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Seth Pamperin
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4.5
Arthur Hainline
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.89
Matthew Sachs
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.83
Gaurav Chandra
38W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Kyle Arnold
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.80
Matthew Seiden
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Joshua Ong
17W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Michael Trainer
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Geoffrey Brennan
33W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Alvin Choy
60W–46L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Flint Christian
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Harlan Strader
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kilby Featherston
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.