Teams

Abell

2026 18&Over Men Manhattan · 4.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.40 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-28vs ChoyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Abell / Spencer Koh vs Matthew Sachs / Bryan Chu7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJake Bowling vs Ryan Casserly6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael van Dusen vs Daniel Lomelin4-6, 5-7
2026-06-19vs The RookiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdward Park / Spencer Koh vs Oliver Li / Eric Wang7-5, 6-6
L#1 SinglesEddy Ou vs Jon Ciangiulli2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesZachary Gindes vs Taehyo Kim6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs Metro: Papi's PawnsLost 13
L#1 DoublesEdward Park / Jake Bowling vs Jesse Kallins / Edwin Zhang1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Hwang vs Wade Tucker2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEddy Ou / Jose Pincay vs David Kambhu / Erik Rauch5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichael van Dusen vs Cosmo Amabile5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-02vs RomanoWon 41
W#1 DoublesJake Bowling / Edward Park vs Carson Braun / Brendan Thomas6-3, 5-5
W#1 SinglesMichael Hwang vs Gabriel Bonilla6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKyle Rudolf / Matthew Godlewski vs Adam Jaskowski / Horatio Wildman3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichael van Dusen vs Edward Forward5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Abell / Michael Zhao vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-17vs ChoyLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatthew Godlewski / Spencer Koh vs Ananth Mohan / Randall Weber-Levine1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJake Bowling vs Daniel Lomelin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEddy Ou / Justin Chanthalangsy vs Michael Trainer / Geoffrey Brennan2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichael van Dusen vs Andrew Murano7-6, 3-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Abell / Alexander Perry vs Matthew Seiden / Bryan Chu6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Low/MoramarcoLost 12
W#1 SinglesMichael Hwang vs Danny Tocco7-5, 6-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Abell vs LOUIS PREMONT1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Godlewski / Eddy Ou vs Mitchell Low / Nikola Ristic1-6, 1-6
2026-04-23vs Wong/JordanLost 23
W#1 DoublesAndrew Abell / Matthew Godlewski vs Thomas Lodge / Sam Gnesin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJake Bowling vs Alejandro Weil3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesZachary Gindes / Jose Pincay vs Maxwell Payson / Ryan Lee6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichael Zhao vs Ian Gregory-Davis5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Rudolf / Gareth Woods vs William Loh / Andrew Kelley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Michael van Dusen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.27
Michael Hwang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.26
Andrew Abell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Jose Pincay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Jake Bowling
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.01
Alexander Perry
published 4.5
3.92
Eddy Ou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.85
Spencer Koh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Steven Lai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Edward Park
published 4
3.67
Matthew Godlewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gareth Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Chanthalangsy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Rudolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Tran
published
Michael Zhao
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zachary Gindes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jake Bowling + Andrew Abell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael van Dusen
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Michael Hwang
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrew Abell
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
Jose Pincay
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Jake Bowling
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alexander Perry
21W–11L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.01
4.5
Eddy Ou
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.92
Spencer Koh
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Steven Lai
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Edward Park
25W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Godlewski
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Gareth Woods
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Justin Chanthalangsy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Rudolf
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Larry Tran
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Zhao
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Gindes
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.