Teams

CCV BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-28vs SS-LT BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Abrams / Ilan Behm vs Raghav Dube / Sumeet Kabra2-6, 4-6
2024-05-21vs PRC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesIlan Behm / Eli Goldstein vs Jeff Skolnick / Eric Olsen-Dufour3-6, 6-7
2024-05-14vs VCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesIlan Behm / Arion Robbins vs William Stoughton / Dean Flora6-2, 6-2
2024-05-07vs CPV REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesIlan Behm / Arion Robbins vs Michael Vernon / Christopher Huser4-6, 2-6
2024-04-30vs RRTC GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesIlan Behm vs Devon Turnick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-23vs WC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesIlan Behm / Joel Aronoff vs Mathew Jones / Michael Baker4-6, 6-7
2024-04-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesIlan Behm vs Andrew Landon6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Scott Klein
published
3.57
Ilan Behm
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.51
Matt Spalding
published
3.48
Jason Abrams
published
3.38
Arion Robbins
published 3.5
3.32
Chad Mezvinsky
published 3.5
3.30
Eli Goldstein
published
3.24
Joel Aronoff
published
Dan Marks
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Abrams + Chad Mezvinsky3256% games+4.4% vs expected
Arion Robbins + Joel Aronoff224 matchesnot enough data
Eli Goldstein + Joel Aronoff314 matchesnot enough data
Arion Robbins + Chad Mezvinsky123 matchesnot enough data
Arion Robbins + Matt Spalding303 matchesnot enough data
Jason Abrams + Matt Spalding303 matchesnot enough data
Chad Mezvinsky + Eli Goldstein123 matchesnot enough data
Joel Aronoff + Scott Klein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Klein
14W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.58
3.5
Ilan Behm
54W–28L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Matt Spalding
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Jason Abrams
42W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Arion Robbins
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Chad Mezvinsky
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Eli Goldstein
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Joel Aronoff
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Dan Marks
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.