Teams

VCC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-02vs CPV REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesWilliam Alquist vs Alexis Tibar4-6, 1-6
2024-05-28vs PRC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Alquist / William Stoughton vs Jeff Skolnick / Pat Conroy6-2, 6-4
2024-05-14vs CCV BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesWilliam Alquist vs Jason Abrams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBlair Gifford / Matt Yeingst vs Joel Aronoff / Matt Spalding3-6, 1-6
2024-05-10vs DCHS GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Alquist / Blair Gifford vs Mark Fujita / Matthew Travis3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJake Dosen vs Dillon Landon7-6, 7-6
2024-05-07vs RRTC GREENLost 12
L#1 SinglesJake Dosen vs Tim Zimmerman6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBlair Gifford / William Stoughton vs Dirk Hanket / Charles Beckstrom6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Alquist vs Trevor David4-6, 3-6
2024-04-30vs WC GREENLost 03
L#1 SinglesWilliam Alquist vs Michael Baker7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Fielder / Blair Gifford vs Pete Petrou / Eric Graham3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJake Dosen / Matt Yeingst vs Eyal Tzarfati / Javier Malaga4-6, 4-6
2024-04-16vs SS-LT BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Stoughton / Blair Gifford vs Prasenjit Mitra / Dushyanth David Maguluru4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJake Dosen vs Sachin Madan0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Charles Cook
published 3.5
3.31
William Alquist
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Blair Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Jake Dosen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.78
Robert Goodman
published
Dean Flora
published 3
John Fielder
published
Matt Yeingst
published
Seth Foreman
published
William Stoughton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Gifford + William Alquist7362% games−1.1% vs expected
Blair Gifford + William Stoughton3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Cook
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
William Alquist
69W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Blair Gifford
61W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Jake Dosen
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Robert Goodman
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Dean Flora
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Fielder
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Yeingst
0W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Seth Foreman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Stoughton
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.