Teams

NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Hoover -Launchpad

2022 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesDenise Nisbett / Eric Stegman vs Andrew Linden / Selin Bastas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Hoover / Emily Nixon vs Alex Carney / Keyuko Kuyama5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Ward / Mike Lyon vs Douglas Linden / Brenda Scott6-1, 5-6, 1-0
2022-04-10vs NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Engel-PTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesZiad Jaara / Victoria Watson vs Timothy Fisher / Rosanna Wong4-6, 5-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Nixon / Emily Nixon vs Clyde Jeff Trumbull / Carolyn Trumbull4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Janes / Julie MacMillan vs Victor Hartzell / Ashley Hartzell6-7, 0-3
2022-04-03vs NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Chew/McEwen-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Rumpf / Andrew Janes vs Wendy Poitinger / Matthew McEwen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Nisbett / Eric Stegman vs Julie Britton / Brian Meyer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Nixon / Steve Nixon vs Amy Beaverson / William Connelly Jr6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesVictoria Watson / Ziad Jaara vs Sushil Sudershan / Theresa Vietmeier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Stegman / Denise Nisbett vs Nina Barudzic / Aco Radujevic7-6, 5-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSamantha LaPointe / Andrew Janes vs Melissa Hill / Kyle Crocker6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNancy Rumpf / Timothy Hoover vs Anne Parker / Landon Shell6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Ward / Steve Nixon vs Hannah Shell / Nick Eyde6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSamantha LaPointe / Andrew Janes vs Janet Daniel / Matt Damschroder7-5, 6-4
2022-03-13vs NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Smith -PTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha LaPointe / Timothy Hoover vs Lana Sweeney / Jason Abodeely6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Nixon / Steve Nixon vs Lucinda Busselle / Rick Busselle6-7, 4-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie MacMillan / Mike Lyon vs Lisa Evans / Steven Slocum6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesEric Stegman / Denise Nisbett vs Michael Toland / Jennifer Walton6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Rumpf / Andrew Janes vs Karleen Vrzal / James Allen6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Watson / Ziad Jaara vs Paul Vrzal / Jen Sanderson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 8.0MX King/Sudershan-TWOS7016517169
2NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Chew/McEwen-SVC5213818155
3NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Engel-PTC5213819157
4NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Hoover -Launchpad5214721164
5NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Szczechowski-SVC3471431208
6NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Damschroder/Daniel-Launchpad2581329209
7NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Smith -PTC1671431207
8NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mx Bloomquist/Naus0761534229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Nancy Rumpf
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.96
Ziad Jaara
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Andrew Janes
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.83
Samantha LaPointe
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.79
Mike Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Eric Stegman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Denise Nisbett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Julie MacMillan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Steve Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Emily Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.53
Sarah Ward
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Victoria Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Janes + Samantha LaPointe7360% games+9.6% vs expected
Steve Nixon + Emily Nixon272650% games−2.2% vs expected
Eric Stegman + Denise Nisbett161251% games−2.9% vs expected
Andrew Janes + Sarah Ward3350% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Janes + Nancy Rumpf6068% gamesnot enough data
Samantha LaPointe + Timothy Hoover3253% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Ward + Timothy Hoover4165% gamesnot enough data
Emily Nixon + Timothy Hoover404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Rumpf
93W–39L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ziad Jaara
77W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Andrew Janes
139W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Samantha LaPointe
226W–121L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Mike Lyon
141W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Eric Stegman
222W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Denise Nisbett
126W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Julie MacMillan
42W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Steve Nixon
254W–160L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Emily Nixon
315W–260L career · 7 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Sarah Ward
210W–176L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Victoria Watson
93W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
Timothy Hoover
78W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.