Teams

OC Team Courage LPC- Nisha - Sat11

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Deidre Beckley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.66
Dean Ho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.43
EDWARD CHOI
published
4.33
Kristina Chen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Tai Sisson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Meng-Chieh Lee
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.16
Masami Hashimoto
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.68
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Alan Chan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.36
Nisha Anish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jena Roghair
published
Rafael Nieto
published
Santanu Das
published
shahram yazdanpanah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabrina MacLachlan + EDWARD CHOI224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Deidre Beckley
76W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Dean Ho
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.66
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Kristina Chen
152W–91L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
4.33
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Meng-Chieh Lee
135W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Masami Hashimoto
108W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
159W–80L career · 7 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Alan Chan
80W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Jena Roghair
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafael Nieto
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Santanu Das
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
shahram yazdanpanah
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.