Teams

KY/LEX-Johnson & Johnson

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Camille Morrow
published 4
3.85
Katie Parrish
published
3.71
Hiroko Nakata
published
3.44
Sarah Stykes
published
3.40
Emily Diehl
published
3.39
Janine Coy
published
3.36
Laura Singler
published
3.34
Emily Pernice
published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
published
3.30
Sarah Delahanty
published
3.29
Jeannie Guskey
published
3.28
Lynn Littrell
published
3.25
3.15
Yvonne Conner
published
3.11
Christina Bishop
published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Johnson
published
3.05
Karen Sandberg
published
2.88
Natalie Avant
published
2.76
Leah Lykins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Stykes + Sarah Delahanty5169% games+6.9% vs expected
Katie Parrish + Camille Morrow10461% games+3.3% vs expected
Jeannie Guskey + Emily Diehl3548% games−1.8% vs expected
Tanya Johnson + Natalie Avant0636% games−13.0% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Littrell + Tanya Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Janine Coy + Hiroko Nakata303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Morrow
22W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
Hiroko Nakata
37W–24L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Sarah Stykes
30W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Laura Singler
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Jordan Reeves
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.34
Sarah Delahanty
30W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jeannie Guskey
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Lynn Littrell
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Christina Bishop
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tanya Johnson
6W–34L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Karen Sandberg
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.