Teams

Gillis/Nashville

2022 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Nina Kumar
published
3.35
Kelly Clapp
published
3.33
Lauren Wideman
published
Carrie Moeller
published 3.5
3.23
Claudia Paz
published 3.5
3.01
Brooke Parrish
published 3
2.75
Mary Oxford
published
2.63
Katherine Kirkland
published
2.61
Darci Kimmerling
published 3
2.19
Emma Anderson
published 2.5
Julie Buford
published
Mimi Hayati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Wideman + Nina Kumar16953% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Kumar
50W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kelly Clapp
42W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lauren Wideman
34W–44L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Carrie Moeller
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Claudia Paz
35W–27L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Brooke Parrish
36W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mary Oxford
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Katherine Kirkland
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Darci Kimmerling
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Emma Anderson
4W–20L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Julie Buford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mimi Hayati
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.