Teams

Pelican Bay North - Behmaram

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-22vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Patricia Reed vs Rosemary Rolak / Susan Rogge1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Enxing / Behnoosh Behmaram vs Nora Slusar / Katherine Morehead6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Deanne Brandstetter vs Audra DiDonato / Suzanne Kirsch6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs Quail West - DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Toni Marie Silverman vs Jill Teberg / Terry Hammer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBehnoosh Behmaram / Amy Enxing vs Mary Huber-Olk / Sylvia Lamantia6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudi Howard / Kristine O'Meara vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-08vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSue Malek / Sharon Bartle vs SUE BECK / Mara Mazza3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Enxing / Toni Marie Silverman vs Margaret Laggis / Kristine Bergenheim6-1, 6-1
2024-05-07vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Enxing / Kathleen Iverson vs Cyndee Verhelle / Maria Lafontaine5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElyse Descalzi / Kristine O'Meara vs Sonja Pound / Sharon Herbst3-6, 5-7
2024-04-17vs Fiddlers Creek - BoneventoWon 20
W#1 DoublesSue Malek / Sharon Bartle vs Barbara Slifkin / Sarah Ives6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Susan Fasig vs Odette Kardek / Kerry Turner6-2, 6-3
2024-04-10vs COLLIER/Beaudet/40&Over3.5 WLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Malek / Sharon Bartle vs Krista Lombardo / Sharon Sturges6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-04-03vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSharon Bartle / Sue Malek vs Christine Siciliano / Brooke Sykes6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Susan Fasig vs Megumi Yoshida / Rachel Goode4-6, 2-6
2024-03-27vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Malek / Tamara Durante vs Ricki Giersch / Dana Sacks6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTami Turner / Kathleen Iverson vs Renee Facciola / Jacqueline Heise4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDeanne Brandstetter / Susan Fasig vs Karen Correa / Deb Dorsey6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Tami Turner
published
3.50
Amy Enxing
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Sue Malek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Tamara Durante
published
3.41
Dawn Cyr
published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Bartle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Kathleen Iverson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Susan Fasig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Judi Howard
published
3.23
Toni Marie Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Lisa Lamorgese
published
3.16
Kristine O'Meara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Behnoosh Behmaram
published 3.5
3.08
Deanne Brandstetter
published 3.5
Elyse Descalzi
published
Lisa McCarthy
published
Margaret Izzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Malek + Sharon Bartle6752% games+3.9% vs expected
Sue Malek + Tamara Durante5259% games+3.9% vs expected
Toni Marie Silverman + Sharon Bartle10259% games+2.8% vs expected
Susan Fasig + Behnoosh Behmaram5947% games+0.3% vs expected
Sue Malek + Amy Enxing9355% games−1.5% vs expected
Sharon Bartle + Amy Enxing3448% gamesnot enough data
Toni Marie Silverman + Judi Howard134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Marie Silverman + Amy Enxing224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tami Turner
35W–19L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Amy Enxing
104W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Sue Malek
148W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Tamara Durante
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Dawn Cyr
31W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sharon Bartle
132W–107L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Susan Fasig
60W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Judi Howard
78W–98L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Toni Marie Silverman
60W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Lisa Lamorgese
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristine O'Meara
24W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Behnoosh Behmaram
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deanne Brandstetter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Elyse Descalzi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa McCarthy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Izzo
34W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.