Teams

KCrosby/KBattle (Sardis)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-30vs LBeaty (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Whalan / Tracy Thomas vs Halie Leonard / Gianna Elden6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMartha Metzl / Erica Adcock vs Dorothy Garrity / Toni Escuder6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-09-23vs JIson/DCazorla (BCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesRenee Broud / Katie Ferry vs Jennifer Ison / Andrea Cowart6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Battle / Sarah Asby vs Nancy Scholz / April Pacheco6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-16vs CAckels (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMary Laird Garrison / Amie Caudle vs Michele Messmer / Julia Murphy6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Whalan / Kate Johnson vs Sumi Gerry / Jenjer Robin6-1, 6-2
2024-09-09vs VSofarelli/VKoskinas (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Broud / Katie Ferry vs Lindsey Barnes / Jamie Zarambo7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Asby / Kimberly Battle vs Brandi Hoover / Amanda Eagan7-6, 6-2
2024-08-28vs KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Whalan / Mary Laird Garrison vs Beth Hahn / Carrie Carickhoff6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErica Adcock / Martha Metzl vs Amy Yancey / Catherine Bauer2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErin Zelickson / Katie Crosby vs Katie O'Shea / Carrie Kramer6-4, 7-5
2024-08-26vs NFitzgerald/KWard (Springfield)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Ferry / Martha Metzl vs Kara Ward / Alice Hart6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Asby / Tracy Thomas vs Debra Schwede / Barbara Moysaenko2-6, 3-6
2024-08-19vs SStorck (Rama)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Broud / Ruth Harris vs Tracy Graham / Lorie Lewis7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Metzl / Erica Adcock vs Linda Lober / Charlotte Haydon6-2, 6-3
2024-08-05vs KCox (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRuth Harris / Anne Whalan vs Leslie Simmons / Haley Timperio6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Laird Garrison / Amie Caudle vs Katie Cox / Torey Parsons6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin Zelickson / Martha Metzl vs Shanin Russell / Jennifer Farrell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Katie Crosby
published
3.70
Mary Laird Garrison
published
3.61
Renee Broud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Amie Caudle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.55
Martha Metzl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.53
Kimberly Battle
published
3.51
Anne Whalan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Erin Zelickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Sarah Asby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Erica Adcock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Katie Ferry
published
3.15
Kate Johnson
published
3.04
Patricia Phelan
published
2.89
Ruth Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Whalan + Amie Caudle6364% games+11.6% vs expected
Erin Zelickson + Erica Adcock23367% games+8.9% vs expected
Martha Metzl + Sarah Asby14360% games+8.7% vs expected
Renee Broud + Katie Crosby4161% games+8.6% vs expected
Amie Caudle + Katie Crosby2352% games+8.3% vs expected
Martha Metzl + Amie Caudle12166% games+8.0% vs expected
Mary Laird Garrison + Sarah Asby5070% games+7.9% vs expected
Amie Caudle + Mary Laird Garrison6161% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Crosby
69W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.94
Mary Laird Garrison
60W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.70
Renee Broud
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Amie Caudle
175W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Martha Metzl
153W–69L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Kimberly Battle
46W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Anne Whalan
111W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Erin Zelickson
82W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Sarah Asby
91W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Erica Adcock
76W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Katie Ferry
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Kate Johnson
33W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Patricia Phelan
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Ruth Harris
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.