Teams

WC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-01vs PRC REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesKyle Davis / Fauna MacKillip vs Julie Hernandez / Kelly Glenn6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Magdalena Chamberlain2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Gamble / Jill Nelson vs Linda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Sherri Bliss6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Melody Sattizahn vs Henriette Nash / Franny Schmidt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-25vs CACI YELLOWLost 14
L#1 DoublesVirginia Gamble / Kyle Davis vs Allison Stewart / Angela D'Alessandro2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Crystal Hostelley6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Asako Ohara vs Georgina Swales / Jennifer Benson4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Jacqueline Tynes1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Jill Nelson vs Kelly Raab / Joby Koren6-7, 6-7
2023-05-21vs SS-LT REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Asako Ohara vs Colleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Marika Fodor4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFauna MacKillip / Melody Sattizahn vs Adele Rhinehart / Dana Anderson4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLaura Else vs Joyce Naylon6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJill Nelson / Virginia Gamble vs Cinda Nab / Leisa Hollis6-7, 6-7
2023-05-18vs HW TEALLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristin Linhardt / Fauna MacKillip vs Daniele Dattilo / Jill Smith1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Kirsten Washer6-4, 4-1
L#2 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Kyle Davis vs Meredith van Wyk / Melissa Miller7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Christy Serenyi2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Jill Nelson vs CC Dick / Brooke Rebstock6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-04vs HV GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Vicki Zeeb vs Kris LaValley / Kathy Shepherd1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Holly Gant6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVirginia Gamble / Asako Ohara vs Heather Mantel / Mim Lyles6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Leisha Andersen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKyle Davis / Fauna MacKillip vs Elizabeth Anderson / Deidre Torrey6-2, 6-3
2023-04-20vs PH NAVYWon 32
W#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Asako Ohara vs Kimberly Creedon / Julie Picha6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Kathleen Kenny Davia4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt vs Gina Maestas / Nhung Van3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Tracy Wells5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Jill Nelson vs Christy Brant / Libby Conlin6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Naomi Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Asako Ohara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Laura Else
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.17
Fauna MacKillip
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Ramsey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.14
Melody Sattizahn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Virginia Gamble
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Jill Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Kristin Linhardt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Kyle Davis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Vicki Zeeb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melody Sattizahn + MaryBeth Doerr2541% games+2.5% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Melody Sattizahn3541% games+1.8% vs expected
Naomi Fisher + Asako Ohara4262% games−0.9% vs expected
Virginia Gamble + Kristin Linhardt3348% games−2.2% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Kristin Linhardt93142% games−4.0% vs expected
Melody Sattizahn + Jill Nelson71544% games−5.6% vs expected
MaryBeth Doerr + Jill Nelson2341% gamesnot enough data
Virginia Gamble + Kyle Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Naomi Fisher
58W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Asako Ohara
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Else
39W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Fauna MacKillip
158W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
Jennifer Ramsey
43W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Melody Sattizahn
78W–121L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Virginia Gamble
38W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jill Nelson
31W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kristin Linhardt
19W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Kyle Davis
22W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Vicki Zeeb
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.