Teams

BOYLE PK 18AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Natasa Riisgaard
published
3.74
Beth Crittenden
published 4
3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.71
Naomi Gray
published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
published 4
3.65
Kat Thornton
published
3.58
3.58
Lauren West
published
3.56
Tina Skouras
published
3.50
Jodi Krawitt
published
3.45
Christine Neumeier
published 3.5
3.42
Colleen Sonneborn
published 3.5
3.38
Nancy Tuhtan
published
Amy Niles
published 3.5
3.13
Nina Kim
published
Dominika Halka
published
Sandy Shepherd
published
Tracey Porter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Sonneborn + Nina Kim7356% games+9.6% vs expected
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Tuhtan + Colleen Sonneborn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasa Riisgaard
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Beth Crittenden
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Naomi Gray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kat Thornton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Candace Davenport
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lauren West
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Jodi Krawitt
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Christine Neumeier
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Colleen Sonneborn
28W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Nancy Tuhtan
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Amy Niles
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Kim
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Dominika Halka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Shepherd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Porter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.