Teams

OC LLW Mission Viejo - Gee - Sun1030

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.78 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-06vs OC RCI - Cheryl - Sun1pmWon 20
W#2 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs Laurie Allen3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMariela Farley / Yuka Nabangxang vs Ashley Hay / Kathy Doolaege6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesChristy Dozor / Julia Bruno McAndrew vs Stephany Medina / Madona Shaheen6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulia Bruno McAndrew vs Ji Young Han7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs Narae Kim6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs Bridget Khazanovich6-2, 6-4
2025-06-15vs OC Heritage Park - Alicia - Sun9Won 10
W#3 DoublesMariela Farley / Diane Miller vs Wendy Hudson / Nancy Marcosa6-1, 6-1
2025-05-25vs OC YLCC - Sandra - Sun1Won 10
W#2 DoublesMariela Farley / Yuka Nabangxang vs Mischa King / Sandra Barnette6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen Aistars / Mariela Farley vs Barbara Lynn Allison / Patricia Chacon6-1, 6-1
2025-05-17vs OC Palisades - Drew - Sun2Split 11
L#1 SinglesJulia Bruno McAndrew vs Cynthia Turner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRita Haddad / Mariela Farley vs Reiko Kurakazu / Katie Gerber6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEllen Aistars / Mariela Farley vs Nathally Cespedes / Erin Rudsinski3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulia Bruno McAndrew vs Maria Reichel6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs Judith Beleber6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Aida Morad
published 4
3.70
Julia Bruno McAndrew
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
3.64
Chelsea van Niekerk
published 3.5
3.58
Mariela Farley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Caroline Gee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Christy Dozor
published 4
3.52
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.42
Gina Christiansen
published
3.39
Ellen Aistars
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Julia Keene
published
3.31
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.26
Jenny Thurrell
published
3.22
Rita Haddad
published
Yuka Nabangxang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Aistars + Caroline Gee6753% games+5.3% vs expected
Julia Bruno McAndrew + Mariela Farley314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Gee + Julia Keene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aida Morad
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Julia Bruno McAndrew
61W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Allie Bertocchini
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Mariela Farley
40W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Caroline Gee
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Christy Dozor
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Gina Christiansen
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Ellen Aistars
31W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Julia Keene
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Jenny Thurrell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Rita Haddad
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Yuka Nabangxang
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.