Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Stephen Buchholz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Darien Lum
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Steve Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Thinh Vo
published
3.59
Jim Collins
published
3.58
Scott Judy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jeff Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Nicholas Mastrangelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Mark Joseph
published
3.39
Dale Welsh
published 3.5
3.33
Albert Blake
published 3.5
3.29
David Pintado
published 3.5
Chris Dundon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Vincent Yamamoto
published
3.14
Tony LaFrance
published
3.13
Steven Bliss
published
3.08
J Patrick Forden
published
3.00
Mark Keeling
published
2.85
Chandra Mundra
published 3
Ed Nakagawa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Joseph + Jim Collins5074% games+7.9% vs expected
J Patrick Forden + Dale Welsh1440% games−2.2% vs expected
Stephen Buchholz + Scott Judy303 matchesnot enough data
Tony LaFrance + Chandra Mundra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Buchholz
26W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Darien Lum
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Wheeler
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Jim Collins
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Scott Judy
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Nicholas Mastrangelo
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Mark Joseph
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dale Welsh
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Albert Blake
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Pintado
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Chris Dundon
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Yamamoto
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tony LaFrance
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Steven Bliss
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
J Patrick Forden
10W–21L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Mark Keeling
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Chandra Mundra
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Ed Nakagawa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.