Teams

RISE AC-Mower/Sneddon

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesJuliette Longson / Lisa Cannon vs Claudine Finlay / Jennifer Sampson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShelley Petersen vs Britany Egan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Alisa Gardner1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJuliette Longson / Lisa Cannon vs Alena Taylor / Chandi Hurd7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGlenna Frey / Natalie Stobbe vs Marissa Jackson - (DQ) / Jessica Fry3-6, 1-6
2021-05-18vs Sun Pro-Fowkes/BurnsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Garff / Kacee Preston vs Cheryl Harker / DeeAnn Edwards6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNikki Mower vs Rebekah Westfall6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelley Petersen / Jenni Price vs Ashley Bailey / Karen Nielson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-11Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Cannon / Juliette Longson vs Tracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Megan Schey5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Stobbe vs Shauna Lake3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-04vs Ivory Ridge-Allen/MadsenLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Megan Warren1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNikki Mower vs DeeAnna Barlow6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJuliette Longson / Lisa Cannon vs Jennifer Hardin / Amy Allen0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-27vs Park City MARC-SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Mower / Lynsey Sneddon vs Sue Ann Kern / Wendy Engel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Petersen / Natalie Stobbe vs Sally Nadler / Terry Sidford7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNikki Mower / Kacee Preston vs Terri Brunner / Heather Sliwa6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Lindsey Metcalf4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Petersen / Natalie Stobbe vs Becky Hall / Shelly Kemp6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJuliette Longson / Stacey Schmerse vs Cassandra Ando / Sheri Thompson3-6, 2-6
2021-04-13vs South Jordan-Bennett/FinlayWon 20
W#1 DoublesNikki Mower / Lynsey Sneddon vs Claudine Finlay / Britany Egan6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Jennie Bethers6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jenni Price
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Nikki Mower
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.40
Shelley Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.27
Natalie Stobbe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Kyra Dunshee
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.10
Glenna Frey
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
2.95
Lori Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Juliette Longson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kacee Preston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Moss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lisa Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Garff
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Stacey Schmerse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Cannon + Natalie Stobbe11259% games+6.5% vs expected
Nikki Mower + Nicole Garff10656% games+6.1% vs expected
Kacee Preston + Nicole Garff6160% games+5.9% vs expected
Jenni Price + Nicole Garff20658% games+5.0% vs expected
Lisa Cannon + Shelley Petersen11257% games+3.9% vs expected
Lisa Cannon + Juliette Longson5946% games+2.3% vs expected
Kacee Preston + Nikki Mower4355% games+1.1% vs expected
Glenna Frey + Kyra Dunshee392850% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Price
110W–73L career · 11 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Nikki Mower
123W–92L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Shelley Petersen
87W–90L career · 4 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Natalie Stobbe
87W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kyra Dunshee
96W–117L career · 11 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Glenna Frey
65W–72L career · 8 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
Lori Wilson
71W–153L career · 8 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
Juliette Longson
24W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kacee Preston
46W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsay Moss
51W–59L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Cannon
45W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicole Garff
91W–49L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Schmerse
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.