Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Swensen/Sampson

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-01vs Ivory Ridge-Allen/MadsenWon 20
W#2 DoublesDalynn Thomas / Gretel Sampson vs Catherine Peterson / DeeAnna Barlow6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Bessy Nielson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-25vs RISE AC-Mower/SneddonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Clawson / Jessica Gardner vs Nicole Garff / Stacey Schmerse7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Lindsay Moss6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMary Kathryn Harman vs Rachel Mcillece2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDalynn Thomas / Gretel Sampson vs Lezlae Grubb / Sheri Thompson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-11vs South Jordan-Bennett/FinlayWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Kathryn Harman / Gretel Sampson vs Marisa Smith / Monica Kirby4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNatalie Clawson vs Manal Hall7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Swensen / Alisa Gardner vs Ellyn Bennett / Rikke Phinney6-1, 6-3
2021-05-04Won 30
W#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Harman vs Lara Azria-Reucassel6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDalynn Thomas / Chandi Hurd vs Lynne Anderson / Sally Nadler3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Gardner / Natalie Clawson vs Debbie Miller / Cassandra Brown6-1, 6-1
2021-04-27vs Sun Pro-Fowkes/BurnsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Sarah Alton6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Benton / Dalynn Thomas vs Michelle Fowkes / Karen Nielson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-20vs Shepard Park-Williams/ScheyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlisa Gardner / Jessica Gardner vs Sherry Young / Elaine Day6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesNatalie Clawson vs Megan Schey1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDalynn Thomas / Chandi Hurd vs Jamie Sorensen / Lindsey Little6-2, 6-3
2021-04-13vs Ivory Ridge-Allen/MadsenWon 30
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Nicole Miller6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Kathryn Harman vs Cyndi Madsen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Swensen / Emily Benton vs Janee Roper / Megan Warren7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Marissa Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Christine Fotheringham
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 4.5
3.96
Alisa Gardner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Dalynn Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Amy Earl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.72
Kim Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chandi Hurd
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4
3.66
Emily Benton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.55
Katie Swensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Jessica Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Gretel Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Alena Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Mary Kathryn Harman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Natalie Clawson
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Swensen + Christine Fotheringham6080% games+19.3% vs expected
Gretel Sampson + Alisa Gardner11366% games+14.1% vs expected
Amy Earl + Kim Cronin4262% games+14.0% vs expected
Amy Earl + Alisa Gardner19369% games+11.7% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Alisa Gardner14068% games+11.4% vs expected
Alisa Gardner + Christine Fotheringham14562% games+10.5% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Alisa Gardner8160% games+10.1% vs expected
Emily Benton + Alisa Gardner11266% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marissa Jackson
110W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 13 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Alisa Gardner
197W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Dalynn Thomas
77W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Amy Earl
108W–46L career · 10 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Kim Cronin
380W–238L career · 18 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Chandi Hurd
183W–142L career · 13 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Emily Benton
148W–120L career · 10 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · 2 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jessica Gardner
81W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · 11 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Mary Kathryn Harman
36W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Clawson
42W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.