Teams

CV-Julee Moore/Camille Elliott

2024 CV Winter Flex Doubles · CV-Women 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-05vs CV-Ava Schumacher/Gail StewartLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulee Moore / Nancy Heck vs Ava Schumacher / Gail Stewart6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-09vs CV-Jo Bailin/Carmen NokesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulee Moore / Camille Elliott vs Joann Bailin / Carmen Nokes6-1, 6-0
2024-03-04vs CV-Martha Spano/Keron SaundersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulee Moore / Nancy Heck vs Martha Spano / Susan Whitby6-0, 6-1
2024-02-16vs CV-Ava Schumacher/Gail StewartWon 10
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Julee Moore vs Gail Stewart / Ava Schumacher6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Julee Moore vs Linda Clark / Meredith Bearov4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Camille Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Julee Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Nancy Heck
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julee Moore + Camille Elliott5454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Julee Moore
44W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Nancy Heck
31W–23L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.