Teams

Henneman 55+ ES23

2023 Adult 55 & OVER EARLY START · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-12vs Dalton: 3Reunion 55+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Kenneth Gutzman vs Daniel Cassens / David Goodman6-0, 7-6
2022-12-05vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 55+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Jones / Kenneth Gutzman vs Jonathan Farber / Bradley Springer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-28vs Seats: Good Guys 55+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Jones / Edwin Freeman vs Ken Pomerantz / Mark Goldberg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-31vs Dalton: 3Reunion 55+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Kenneth Gutzman vs Peter Vujovich / Hans Rasmussen6-2, 7-5
2022-10-24vs Peschel 55+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarshall Rosner / Mike Jones vs Mark Peschel / Rod Stombaugh6-4, 6-3
2022-10-17vs Seats: Good Guys 55+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Kenneth Gutzman vs David Kerwin / Otto Sanchez6-1, 6-2
2022-10-10vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 55+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesKenneth Gutzman / Mike Jones vs Jon Senum / Peter Puster6-3, 6-2
2022-10-04vs Peterson/Sulzbach 55+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Jones / Richard Schroeder vs Daniel Crouser / Craig Landgraf6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kenneth Gutzman
published
3.80
Bruce Goad
published 4
Doug MacGibbon
published
Edwin Freeman
published
Mike Jones
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Schroeder
published
William Henneman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Jones + Edwin Freeman2447% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Freeman + Kenneth Gutzman2355% gamesnot enough data
Doug MacGibbon + Bruce Goad213 matchesnot enough data
Doug MacGibbon + Richard Schroeder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Gutzman
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Bruce Goad
47W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Doug MacGibbon
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Edwin Freeman
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Jones
118W–62L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Schroeder
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Henneman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.