Teams

BRMST RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs MEA GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSharla Prom / Renee Gracey vs Sarah Schulte / Kelly McGahan6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Gallo vs Kristine Miller3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLori Claussen / Kathleen Connell vs Lisa Varga / Tamara Osborne6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Burchell / Shelli Fazzini vs Barbara Barreca / Susannah Sieper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-12vs FHCC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesSharla Prom / Renee Gracey vs Elaine Barandiaran / Barbara Dingwall6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Saperstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Burchell / Shelli Fazzini vs Brenda Laartz / Laura Wonnacott4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Connell / Pam Decker vs Margee M Sekich / Rebecca Upthegrove6-2, 7-6
2022-07-05vs BCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBeth Saperstein / Pam Decker vs Samantha Bennett / Amy Nichols2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Connell vs Dana Bickham6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSharla Prom / Karen Gallo vs Laura Studebaker / Annette Wright7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammie Donohoe / Shelli Fazzini vs CAROLYN PAUL / Justine Boston7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-28vs LTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShelli Fazzini / Cynthia Burchell vs Rhonda Dudley / Krystal Thomas1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRenee Gracey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Connell / Lori Claussen vs Tammy Duerksen / Lindsay Roland6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Gallo / Tammie Donohoe vs Jennifer Sardinia / MK Mehsling4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-21vs CVTA BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesLori Claussen / Kathleen Connell vs Shaun Howe / Sarah Downey3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPam Decker vs Liz Downey0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSharla Prom / Beth Saperstein vs Steffani Hafner / Michelle Gleason6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTammie Donohoe / Shelli Fazzini vs Alicia Miller / Amy Silverman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-14vs MEA GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesLori Claussen / Kathleen Connell vs Lisa Varga / Audrey Irwin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Saperstein vs Susannah Sieper6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRenee Gracey / Sharla Prom vs Carolyn Sanders / Tamara Osborne6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPam Decker / Tammie Donohoe vs Susan Peterson / Mimi Goodman3-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs FHCC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSharla Prom / Renee Gracey vs Mary Ellen Speights / Barbara Dingwall6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTammie Donohoe vs Elaine Barandiaran2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Brenda Laartz / Shirley Bullinger6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Claussen / Karen Gallo vs Rebecca Upthegrove / Laura Liotino6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Beth Saperstein
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.74
Karen Gallo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Renee Gracey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Cynthia Burchell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Kathleen Connell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Sharla Prom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Shelli Fazzini
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.51
Lori Claussen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.19
Tammie Donohoe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Pam Decker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Gallo + Sharla Prom11951% games+7.2% vs expected
Lori Claussen + Karen Gallo2351% games+1.9% vs expected
Kathleen Connell + Lori Claussen11851% games+1.8% vs expected
Renee Gracey + Sharla Prom312352% games+0.3% vs expected
Beth Saperstein + Pam Decker12954% games−2.9% vs expected
Shelli Fazzini + Karen Gallo171851% games−3.7% vs expected
Lori Claussen + Renee Gracey6746% games−5.1% vs expected
Cynthia Burchell + Shelli Fazzini41042% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Saperstein
35W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Karen Gallo
199W–136L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Renee Gracey
92W–76L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Cynthia Burchell
23W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Kathleen Connell
44W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Sharla Prom
92W–85L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Shelli Fazzini
49W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lori Claussen
32W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Tammie Donohoe
21W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Pam Decker
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.