Teams

8.0 MX 40 & Over

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-27vs Montana/Sposito/Mixed40&Over8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Raymond Armstrong vs Nelson Miller / Camilla McCullough6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Collins / Robert Brooks vs Elizabeth Lund / Scott Stearns1-6, 4-6
2024-07-26vs Montana/Sposito/Mixed40&Over8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / Sarah Miller vs Joanne Sposito / Gordon Terpe5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDean Derby / Elizabeth Helton vs Danielle Smith / Thomas Shea1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Brooks / Anna Collins vs Elizabeth Lund / Scott Stearns1-6, 4-6
2024-07-26vs Montana/Sposito/Mixed40&Over8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / Sarah Miller vs Joanne Sposito / Gordon Terpe4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDean Derby / Elizabeth Helton vs Danielle Smith / Thomas Shea1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Sarah Bach vs Camilla McCullough / Nelson Miller7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-01vs Montana/Sposito/Mixed40&Over8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Brooks / Anna Collins vs Elizabeth Lund / Scott Stearns2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDean Derby / Elizabeth Helton vs Thomas Shea / Danielle Smith2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Sposito/Mixed40&Over8.03193671
28.0 MX 40 & Over133920130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Bach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Dean Derby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Anna Collins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brian Clifton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Helton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Helton + Dean Derby033 matchesnot enough data
Anna Collins + Robert Brooks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Dean Derby
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Brian Clifton
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Helton
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Brooks
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.