Teams

TNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD Spartan pK

2026 Lake USTA Tri Level 55 & Over · Women's Group B 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-09vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Novak / Millie Harrington vs Jill Sullivan-Keating / Cynthia Friess0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Buaron / Mary Clare Hainsworth vs Kathryn Burdick / Megan Hartley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesZahra Simonetti / Angela Jakeway vs Susan Newman / Victoria Ciucci6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-16vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Novak / Kathy Buaron vs Cindy Houser / Leah Rand6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Modlin / Astrid Peterson vs Kathryn Burdick / Victoria Ciucci6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Cullen / Angela Jakeway vs Susan Newman / Lisa Zitel6-4, 2-2
2026-07-14vs TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan PkWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Buaron / Janet Novak vs Stacy Foshee / Katherine Dugan6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Mali Robinson vs Natalie Reid / Heather MacFadyen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZahra Simonetti / Angela Jakeway vs April Buttner / Terri Langbo6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-23vs TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan PkLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Novak / Nicole Kayton vs Shelly Steffey / Katherine Dugan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Amy Cullen vs Mary Wilson / Sharon McAfee1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Rowland / Zahra Simonetti vs Terri Langbo / Natalie Reid2-6, 3-6
2026-06-16vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Modlin / Janet Novak vs Cynthia Friess / Kathryn Burdick6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Buaron / Mary Clare Hainsworth vs Martha Venter / Leah Rand6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDonna Rowland / Amy Cullen vs Sheila O'donnell / Sheryl Theisen6-1, 6-0
2026-06-02vs TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan PkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Vermillion / Janet Novak vs Cindy Japec / Katherine Dugan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Strevell / Kathy Buaron vs Shelly Steffey / Stacy Foshee6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Donna Rowland vs Sheila Hebert / Christine Cantello4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women's Group B 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TLOBA-Baker/Dziadziola/Skybrook 55+ Tri Level82191124259
2TLBKO-Kosior/ Edgemoor Pk64151533264
3TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor55161432254
4TLKED-Edge/RR55151534277
5TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 20264210818152
6TNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD Spartan pK429920165
7TLCFO-Foye/WP46141635289
8TLWGO-Goodwin/Bailey Tri Tues 55+28111943305
9TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan Pk1581023172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Janet Novak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Millie Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Margaret Vermillion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Maggie Strevell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Kathy Buaron
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Ann Modlin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Mali Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Astrid Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Nicole Kayton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Mary Clare Hainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Angela Jakeway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Stacy Beardslee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Donna Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Cullen
published 3
2.70
Zahra Simonetti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zahra Simonetti + Angela Jakeway181749% games+9.1% vs expected
Astrid Peterson + Mali Robinson203445% games−0.4% vs expected
Zahra Simonetti + Stacy Beardslee4549% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Strevell + Kathy Buaron2447% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Buaron + Mary Clare Hainsworth224 matchesnot enough data
Millie Harrington + Maggie Strevell123 matchesnot enough data
Zahra Simonetti + Mary Clare Hainsworth123 matchesnot enough data
Zahra Simonetti + Nicole Kayton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Novak
30W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Millie Harrington
11W–22L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Margaret Vermillion
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Maggie Strevell
36W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Kathy Buaron
183W–148L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Ann Modlin
82W–135L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Mali Robinson
80W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Astrid Peterson
105W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Nicole Kayton
61W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Mary Clare Hainsworth
74W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Angela Jakeway
71W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Stacy Beardslee
117W–144L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Donna Rowland
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Amy Cullen
43W–49L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Zahra Simonetti
140W–173L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.