Teams

TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan Pk

2026 Lake USTA Tri Level 55 & Over · Women's Group B 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-21vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Split 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Katherine Dugan vs Kathryn Burdick / Cindy Houser6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Turley / April Buttner vs Victoria Ciucci / Martha Venter4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesStacy Foshee / Katherine Dugan vs Kathy Buaron / Janet Novak4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Reid / Heather MacFadyen vs Astrid Peterson / Mali Robinson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesApril Buttner / Terri Langbo vs Zahra Simonetti / Angela Jakeway3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-30vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Stacy Foshee vs Jill Sullivan-Keating / Megan Hartley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Wilson / Suzun McCrary vs Cindy Houser / Leah Rand1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Turley / April Buttner vs Lisa Zitel / Susan Newman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesShelly Steffey / Katherine Dugan vs Janet Novak / Nicole Kayton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Wilson / Sharon McAfee vs Stacy Beardslee / Amy Cullen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerri Langbo / Natalie Reid vs Donna Rowland / Zahra Simonetti6-2, 6-3
2026-06-09vs TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Sharon McAfee vs Cynthia Friess / Jill Sullivan-Keating2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Mary Wilson vs Megan Hartley / Leah Rand2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Cantello / Natalie Reid vs Lisa Zitel / Victoria Ciucci6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Katherine Dugan vs Margaret Vermillion / Janet Novak1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Steffey / Stacy Foshee vs Maggie Strevell / Kathy Buaron4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Hebert / Christine Cantello vs Stacy Beardslee / Donna Rowland6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women's Group B 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TLOBA-Baker/Dziadziola/Skybrook 55+ Tri Level82191124259
2TLBKO-Kosior/ Edgemoor Pk64151533264
3TLDAN-Andiloro/Edgemoor55161432254
4TLKED-Edge/RR55151534277
5TLKBU-BURDICK/Bailey Tri 20264210818152
6TNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD Spartan pK429920165
7TLCFO-Foye/WP46141635289
8TLWGO-Goodwin/Bailey Tri Tues 55+28111943305
9TKSST-Steffey/CSD Spartan Pk1581023172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Katherine Dugan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Cindy Japec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Shelly Steffey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Heidi Nyquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Sharon McAfee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Stacy Foshee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Suzun McCrary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Sheila Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Lisa Turley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Terri Langbo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Natalie Reid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Christine Cantello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
April Buttner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Nyquist + Heather MacFadyen171254% games+8.1% vs expected
Heidi Nyquist + Cindy Japec9554% games+2.9% vs expected
Stacy Foshee + Cindy Japec10361% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Foshee + Heather MacFadyen2451% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Japec + Heather MacFadyen2346% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Foshee + Heidi Nyquist044 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Hebert + Lisa Turley224 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Nyquist + Lisa Turley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Dugan
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cindy Japec
240W–219L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
129W–151L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Sharon McAfee
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Stacy Foshee
55W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Suzun McCrary
83W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–128L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Sheila Hebert
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Lisa Turley
116W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Terri Langbo
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Natalie Reid
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Christine Cantello
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
April Buttner
32W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.