Teams

4S:Good Vibes:Amadeo

2023 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 W - 3

22 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-26vs MIT:Milford Magnolias:Nava/NolanWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Amadeo / Shannon Craley vs Jenn Nickell / Kelli Montanaro6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa DiCandido / Sarah OMalley vs Laura King / Janice Lareau1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSilvana Buono / Kristin Healy vs Arla Wiles / Terry Nolan7-5, 6-3
2023-02-19vs 4S:Slice Girls:Lawton/HoneyWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynn Enquist / Christiane Goldman vs Julie Cochran / Quinn Fusco6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Gelman vs Lu Li6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Healy / Silvana Buono vs Wendy English / Cynthia Tornallyay4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie D'Alexander / Terri Weston vs Nancy Meany / Diane Millas2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Amadeo / Monica Ryan vs Jamie Stasko / Junjira Sookvaree4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMari Inagami vs Kara Horvath2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Healy / Terri Weston vs Lana Wall / Nicole Kaya2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa DiCandido / Valerie D'Alexander vs Jeanne Consiglio / Liesl Purviance6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-18vs TRC:Smash Girls:ZwartSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCatherine East / Lynn Enquist vs Misao Naito / Loretta Bohnen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMari Inagami vs Cara Kilgallen6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Craley / Silvana Buono vs Dale Norton / Nicole Rivera2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa DiCandido / Valerie D'Alexander vs Mary Matera / Priscilla Twombly2-6, 6-7
2022-12-11vs MIT:Milford Magnolias:Nava/NolanWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine East / Lynn Enquist vs Amanda Cotter / Kat Carangelo7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErin Gelman vs Melissa Hanna7-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Craley / Christiane Goldman vs Sharon Tralies Walsky / Maggie Nava6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah OMalley / Jennifer Amadeo vs CHRISTINE CHARLES / Jean Bacon6-1, 6-4
2022-11-20vs 4S:Slice Girls:Lawton/HoneyWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine East / Lynn Enquist vs Patricia Rinaldi / Quinn Fusco6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMari Inagami vs Lu Li6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarven Albanese / Jennifer Amadeo vs Cynthia Tornallyay / Jennifer Lawton6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristin Healy / Terri Weston vs Darcy Haskins / Joan Wexelbaum6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCatherine East / Jennifer Amadeo vs Jamie Stasko / Nicole Kaya6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanel Downs / Sarah OMalley vs Jeanne Consiglio / Lynn Allen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa DiCandido / Valerie D'Alexander vs Sarah du Plessis / Wanling Zhu6-3, 6-2
2022-10-23vs TRC:Smash Girls:ZwartWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Margulies / Emily Keating vs Norma Zwart / Kim Flynn6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Gelman vs Dale Norton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMonica Ryan / Carven Albanese vs Cheryl Dziubina / Elizabeth Zarrilli6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGwen Burmester / Silvana Buono vs Loretta Bohnen / Nicole Rivera4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W - 3 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Amy Margulies
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Emily Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Lisa DiCandido
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Erin Gelman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Janel Downs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jennifer Amadeo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Catherine East
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sarah OMalley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Shannon Craley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Kristin Healy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alexandra Beaumont
published 3.5
Elizabeth Rose
published 3.5
Gwen Burmester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lynn Enquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Carven Albanese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Christiane Goldman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Silvana Buono
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Hussey
published
Mari Inagami
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Monica Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Terri Weston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie D'Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine East + Lisa DiCandido4255% games+17.1% vs expected
Mari Inagami + Lisa DiCandido5262% games+14.8% vs expected
Shannon Craley + Amy Margulies9556% games+10.5% vs expected
Catherine East + Amy Margulies13262% games+9.2% vs expected
Janel Downs + Sarah OMalley10358% games+6.5% vs expected
Jennifer Amadeo + Catherine East11755% games+5.0% vs expected
Silvana Buono + Catherine East8552% games+3.9% vs expected
Amy Margulies + Lisa DiCandido4164% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Margulies
77W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Emily Keating
66W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Lisa DiCandido
124W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Erin Gelman
71W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.60
Janel Downs
140W–94L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
Jennifer Amadeo
112W–132L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Catherine East
128W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Sarah OMalley
41W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Shannon Craley
98W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristin Healy
35W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Alexandra Beaumont
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Rose
21W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gwen Burmester
34W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Enquist
86W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carven Albanese
53W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christiane Goldman
37W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Silvana Buono
49W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Laura Hussey
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mari Inagami
63W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Ryan
68W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Weston
13W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie D'Alexander
19W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.