Teams

TCU MCGUIRE

2025 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Ladies · Sunday Ladies 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-27vs BIR BARTLETTSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShannon Mulroy / Megan Bennett vs Kimberly Blakey / Beau Bone6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeidi Weaver vs Gina Stewart4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEva Gregory / Vona Wawryszczuk vs Renee Yackira / Julie Baugh6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie McGuire / Lynn Jumper vs Julia Fitsimones / Camille Reid1-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs SSP MACYWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie McGuire / Eva Gregory vs Joi MacY / Annette Baker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDebra Hiler vs Jennifer Crawford4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanne Rodgers / Lynn Jumper vs Jill Moore / Cecilia Gallardo Solano6-1, 7-5
2025-02-18vs RTC CAULEYWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Jumper / Eva Gregory vs Bernestine Knight / Melinda Whitlock6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJaime Marinaro vs Laura Rich4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVona Wawryszczuk / Debra Hiler vs Diana Ahmad / Meredith Billings6-1, 6-3
2025-02-01vs ATC OLSONSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeanne Rodgers / Lynn Jumper vs Kristy Knowles-Acker / Carrie Winkler3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDebra Hiler vs Sybille Dejonge1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie McGuire / Jaime Marinaro vs Susan Horton / Georgie Zang6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Bennett / Vona Wawryszczuk vs Tisha Mercer / Kista Stahl4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-19vs SSP MACYWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynn Jumper / Julie McGuire vs Lola Gomez / Lori Bennett6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDebra Hiler vs Annette Baker6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJaime Marinaro / Megan Bennett vs Angela Snow / Katherine Dickinson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Arnold / Jeanne Rodgers vs Jill Moore / Tiffany Mckelvey6-3, 6-2
2025-01-16vs BIR BARTLETTLost 13
W#1 DoublesJulie McGuire / Eva Gregory vs Julia Fitsimones / Kimberly Knox7-6, 1-2
L#1 SinglesHeidi Weaver vs Tiffany Rogers5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDeborah Arnold / Jeanne Rodgers vs Rhonda Harmon / Kimberly Blakey5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Mulroy / Megan Bennett vs Julie Baugh / Melissa Laymance2-6, 1-6
2025-01-12vs RTC CAULEYWon 31
W#1 DoublesJeanne Rodgers / Lynn Jumper vs Melinda Whitlock / Bernestine Knight6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEva Gregory vs Laura Rich4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Bennett / Shannon Mulroy vs Diana Ahmad / Jennifer Cottraux6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDebra Hiler / Heidi Weaver vs Laura Schrengohst / Meredith Billings6-4, 6-2
2024-12-15vs ATC OLSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaime Marinaro / Julie McGuire vs Susan Horton / Kristy Knowles-Acker6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Weaver / Eva Gregory vs Linda Brogdon / Ratna Goenardi6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Bennett / Shannon Mulroy vs Tisha Mercer / Kista Stahl6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Sunday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lynn Jumper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.49
Megan Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.49
Jaime Marinaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.44
Julie McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.42
Eva Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Heidi Weaver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Jeanne Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Debra Hiler
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Vona Wawryszczuk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Shannon Mulroy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Deborah Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie McGuire + Eva Gregory8259% games+7.6% vs expected
Heidi Weaver + Eva Gregory5652% games+5.0% vs expected
Shannon Mulroy + Megan Bennett5647% games−7.5% vs expected
Julie McGuire + Jaime Marinaro224 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Marinaro + Megan Bennett404 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Rodgers + Julie McGuire303 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Rodgers + Lynn Jumper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Jumper
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Megan Bennett
45W–31L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jaime Marinaro
40W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Julie McGuire
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Eva Gregory
32W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Heidi Weaver
18W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Jeanne Rodgers
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Debra Hiler
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Vona Wawryszczuk
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Shannon Mulroy
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Deborah Arnold
21W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.