Teams

OLYMPIC CW7.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 7.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
published
4.01
Lisa Lohre
published
4.00
Rebecca Belding
published
3.97
Katherine McCracken
published
3.80
3.66
Rachel Quon
published
3.64
Alex Ferrif
published 3.5
3.45
Elizabeth Griffiths
published
3.37
Shelly Lyon
published
3.36
Julia Hemmendinger
published
3.31
Emily Simone
published
3.25
Lisa Carlin
published
3.25
Blair Evans
published 3.5
3.21
Loren Shealy
published
3.19
Anna Simmons
published 3.5
3.18
Shan Bai
published
3.15
Kasey Quon
published
2.75
Amanda Martial
published 3
2.64
Rachel Manson
published
2.62
Elizabeth Cooper
published
Julie Christy
published
Sherry LaPorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Quon + Rachel Quon3355% games+5.6% vs expected
Lisa Lohre + Caitlin Beatty9653% games+1.3% vs expected
Kasey Quon + Alex Ferrif213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lisa Lohre
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Rebecca Belding
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Katherine McCracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.80
Rachel Quon
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Alex Ferrif
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
Elizabeth Griffiths
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
Shelly Lyon
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Julia Hemmendinger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Emily Simone
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Lisa Carlin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Blair Evans
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Loren Shealy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Anna Simmons
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Shan Bai
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kasey Quon
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Amanda Martial
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Rachel Manson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Elizabeth Cooper
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry LaPorte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.