Teams

Flynn/Saliba/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Women - Monday AM

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-04vs Snap/Whitley/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Wilson / Amy Gilmore vs Laura Wilson / Beth Martin6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGeorgia Jones vs Cindy Knapp6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Marie Dixon / Ashley Saliba vs Scotty Falk / Katherine Goodson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVonda Darr / Kelly Hemmert vs Hailey Hirst / Julia Byron6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-14vs Snap/Whitley/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMargie Barr / Lorraine Thacker vs Lolo Fuhrman / Cindy Knapp3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVonda Darr / Kelly Hemmert vs Hailey Hirst / Scotty Falk7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAshley Saliba vs Julia Byron5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLori Warrick / Shelly Laub vs Laura Wilson / Beth Martin4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Amy Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Warrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Kelly Hemmert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Ashley Saliba
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Margie Barr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Lorraine Thacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Vonda Darr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Ann Marie Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Shelly Laub
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Sharling Grummon
published
3.69
Georgia Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Thacker + Ashley Saliba5358% games+11.5% vs expected
Vonda Darr + Kelly Hemmert3255% games+0.4% vs expected
Kelly Hemmert + Ann Marie Dixon314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Gilmore + Ann Marie Dixon303 matchesnot enough data
Lorraine Thacker + Margie Barr213 matchesnot enough data
Lori Warrick + Ashley Saliba303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Gilmore
30W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
Lori Warrick
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Kelly Hemmert
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Ashley Saliba
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Margie Barr
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Lorraine Thacker
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
Vonda Darr
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ann Marie Dixon
22W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Shelly Laub
35W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Sharling Grummon
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Georgia Jones
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.