Teams

Snap/Whitley/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-18vs Kirkland/Shulman/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLolo Fuhrman / Barbara Hooper vs Patti Hudgins / Yukari Moriyama4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBetsy Delves / Beth Martin vs Nancy McKnight / Marie Hope Kirkland6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCindy Knapp vs Ginger Smith1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Snap / Hailey Hirst vs Lisa Shulman / Laura McFadden2-6, 3-6
2024-11-11vs Robinson/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesHailey Hirst / Gretchen Dahle vs Caroline Jenkins / Elise Crouch2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBetsy Delves / Beth Martin vs Heather Skipper / Brandy Gardner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJulia Byron vs Corey Reese4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Snap / Scotty Falk vs Cathy Cowdrey / Vickie Weatherly3-6, 2-6
2024-11-04vs Flynn/Saliba/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 SinglesCindy Knapp vs Georgia Jones2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesScotty Falk / Katherine Goodson vs Ann Marie Dixon / Ashley Saliba6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHailey Hirst / Julia Byron vs Vonda Darr / Kelly Hemmert4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-28vs Kirkland/Shulman/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesGretchen Dahle / Christy Hermann vs Yukari Moriyama / Patti Hudgins1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Byron vs Kari Pendleton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBetsy Delves / Beth Martin vs Laura McFadden / Lisa Shulman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatherine Goodson vs Nancy McKnight3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLolo Fuhrman / Cindy Knapp vs Leslie McCullough / Vicki Archer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Robinson/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesGretchen Dahle / Betsy Delves vs Caroline Jenkins / Elise Crouch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Knapp vs Jennifer McKenzie1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Byron / Stephanie Snap vs Karla McTaggart / Carolyn Miller6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKatherine Goodson vs Cassianne Robinson-Cohen1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHailey Hirst / Barbara Hooper vs Liza Robinson / Heather Skipper6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-14vs Flynn/Saliba/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLolo Fuhrman / Cindy Knapp vs Margie Barr / Lorraine Thacker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHailey Hirst / Scotty Falk vs Vonda Darr / Kelly Hemmert5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Byron vs Ashley Saliba7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Betsy Delves
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Julia Byron
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.97
Katherine Goodson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.91
Lolo Fuhrman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Jason Snap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Hailey Hirst
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.83
Scotty Falk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Christy Hermann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Gretchen Dahle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Barbara Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Stephanie Snap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Cindy Knapp
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Rob Whitley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Knapp + Lolo Fuhrman7160% games+3.7% vs expected
Barbara Hooper + Lolo Fuhrman4157% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Knapp + Scotty Falk4163% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Goodson + Betsy Delves3262% gamesnot enough data
Hailey Hirst + Betsy Delves404 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Goodson + Scotty Falk314 matchesnot enough data
Christy Hermann + Gretchen Dahle224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Knapp + Christy Hermann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Betsy Delves
38W–12L career · type D · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Julia Byron
33W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Katherine Goodson
44W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Lolo Fuhrman
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Jason Snap
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Hailey Hirst
21W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Scotty Falk
21W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christy Hermann
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Gretchen Dahle
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Hooper
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Stephanie Snap
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Knapp
32W–22L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Rob Whitley
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.