Teams

Nelson 40s

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-08vs CANIHANLost 12
W#1 DoublesCandy Pegram / Katrina Knight vs Veronica Canihan / Cheryl Canady6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Morrison / Lisa Gilbert vs Ashley Novak / Marija Alford4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Phelps / Shannon Berg vs Maggie Bennington / Meredith Cramer3-6, 2-6
2025-05-04vs CANIHANLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren McCarty / Margaret Massey vs Carolyn Medley / Wendy Gilbert7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Beatty vs Helen Mathias-Hinson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Phelps / Sarah Nelson vs Anne Bloomquist / Maggie Bennington6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-10vs CANIHANLost 12
L#1 DoublesCandy Pegram / Anne Egger vs Carolyn Medley / Wendy Gilbert5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Bonfiglio vs Helen Mathias-Hinson0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Morrison / Hannah Holt vs Jennifer Garner / Marija Alford6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-25vs CANIHANLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Cooper / Coo Hocker vs Anne Bloomquist / Maggie Bennington2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Beatty vs Helen Mathias-Hinson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatrina Knight / Deborah Barefoot vs Jennifer Garner / Marija Alford7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnne Egger / Margaret Massey vs Carolyn Medley / Wendy Gilbert7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Adrienne Beatty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Coo Hocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Catherine Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Rachel Bonfiglio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.09
Katrina Knight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Candy Pegram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Deborah Barefoot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Karen McCarty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Hannah Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Lisa Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Margaret Massey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Anne Egger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mary Morketter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McCarty + Anne Egger6154% games−3.6% vs expected
Coo Hocker + Katrina Knight4155% gamesnot enough data
Karen McCarty + Candy Pegram123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adrienne Beatty
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Coo Hocker
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Catherine Morrison
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Rachel Bonfiglio
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Katrina Knight
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Candy Pegram
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Deborah Barefoot
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
4.04
Karen McCarty
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Hannah Holt
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Lisa Phelps
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Margaret Massey
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Anne Egger
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Mary Morketter
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.