Teams

BOYLE PK 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Aiello
published 4
3.75
Beth Crittenden
published 4
3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.69
Michelle Douglas
published
3.69
Anne Sullivan
published 4
3.61
3.59
Judy Campo
published
3.59
Naomi Gray
published
3.57
Dee Ann Ezcurra
published 4
3.56
Rita Williams
published
3.54
Mary Gamble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Tina Skouras
published
3.42
Erin Henke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Tori Herzog
published
3.32
Melinda Whitmore
published
3.30
Nancy Tuhtan
published
3.29
Lisa Carlin
published
3.13
Amy Atherton
published 3.5
Tracey Porter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Tuhtan + Tori Herzog7654% games+2.5% vs expected
Melinda Whitmore + Tori Herzog9553% games+1.3% vs expected
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Michelle Douglas224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Judy Campo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyson Aiello
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Beth Crittenden
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Michelle Douglas
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Candace Davenport
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Judy Campo
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.59
Naomi Gray
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Dee Ann Ezcurra
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Rita Williams
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Tina Skouras
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Tori Herzog
29W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Melinda Whitmore
17W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Nancy Tuhtan
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Lisa Carlin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Amy Atherton
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Tracey Porter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.