Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW7.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

26 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-12vs WILLOW PASS PK CW7.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Deschane / Wendy Gulden vs Yana Bazulina / Jennifer Do7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Holliday / Janice Cain vs Nicole Djobadze / Lourdes Alano2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Poirier / Nanny Tunnell vs Christine Start / Hazel Indick6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesStephanie Kasirajan / Wendy Thomas vs Laurie Radanovich / Alison Erhart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Poirier / Sunita Mistry vs Arwa Kaddoura / Amy Bull7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCindy Rountree / Jill Carlstrom vs Shannon Lynch / Lara Facteau3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Nancy Deschane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Stacey Blackman
published
3.87
Esther Parti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Rountree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Anne Poirier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Kym Dawid
published
3.71
Stephanie Kasirajan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Wendy Gulden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
3.58
Barbara Holliday
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Amy Vassel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Jill Carlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Sunita Mistry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Kara Chizever
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Michelle Bauer
published
3.36
Caroline D Sherbourne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.30
Farrell Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katherine Ryan
published
3.30
Cecily Barclay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Suzanne Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Nanny Tunnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Sarah Shapiro
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Peloquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Kasirajan + Anne Poirier134 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Gulden + Nancy Deschane314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Deschane
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Stacey Blackman
25W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Esther Parti
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Cindy Rountree
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Anne Poirier
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kym Dawid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Stephanie Kasirajan
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Wendy Gulden
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Barbara Holliday
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amy Vassel
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Kara Chizever
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Michelle Bauer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Farrell Pappas
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Katherine Ryan
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Nanny Tunnell
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Hilary Andersen Hurlbut
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.