Teams

Woodlake Cabral

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-20vs Westwood NilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Birnbaum / Ires Foley vs Jessica van Tuyle / Cherie Warfield5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTaryn Giroux / Stacey Cabral vs Ashley Waite / Lisa Greenberg6-2, 6-1
2021-10-18vs Bon Air MetzWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Elliott / Stacey Cabral vs Martha Rhodes / Donna Lawson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-13vs TDC SpillareLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Cabral / Wendy Demarzio vs Patricia Hogan / Rhonda Underwood6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-10-07vs HCC WalshWon 10
W#1 DoublesDianne Revelle / Cindy Birnbaum vs ANJA BAUGH / Lynne Butz6-4, 6-1
2021-09-29vs KRA MillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesVirginia Patterson / Stacey Cabral vs Anne Walker / Martha Hodges6-1, 6-3
2021-09-28vs ACAC WeddleLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Birnbaum / Wendy Demarzio vs Katherine Guerette / Heather Crane1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-09-20vs Avalon KallmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Elliott / Stacey Cabral vs Jeanne Oostdyk / Emily Mason6-3, 6-0
2021-09-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Birnbaum / Ires Foley vs Deirdre Vaughan / Mary Scott1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Cindy Birnbaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Stacey Cabral
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Virginia Patterson
published
2.83
Dianne Revelle
published 3
2.82
Wendy Learn
published
2.75
Allie Hannon
published 3
2.72
Taryn Giroux
published
2.51
Alison Joyce
published 3
Paula Maddern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Hannon + Wendy Learn3252% games+5.1% vs expected
Cindy Birnbaum + Stacey Cabral5254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Birnbaum
205W–155L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Stacey Cabral
217W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
Virginia Patterson
20W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Dianne Revelle
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Wendy Learn
25W–29L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Allie Hannon
28W–40L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Taryn Giroux
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Alison Joyce
2W–28L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
2.51
Paula Maddern
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.