Teams

Koch

2025 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-26vs HillWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott A Green / Michael McGowan vs Mike Patterson / Richard Snader6-2, 2-1
W#2 DoublesJames Appel / Joseph Flynn vs Richard Amos / Paul Devlin6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-10vs HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Kelly / George Sybert vs David Mason / Mike Patterson6-2, 6-1
2025-07-06vs HillWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael McGowan / Michael Remoll vs Richard Amos / Paul Devlin7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShaun Edwards / William Willard vs Mike Patterson / Shawn Pindell7-5, 6-3
2025-07-02vs HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Kelly / George Sybert vs Frank Burnett / Richard Snader6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Scott A Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Michael McGowan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
George Sybert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Ritter
published
3.35
Greg Koch
published
3.33
Joseph Flynn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Andrew Mullins
published 3.5
3.27
Shaun Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Michael Remoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
James Appel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
William Willard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Remoll + Michael McGowan4158% gamesnot enough data
Michael McGowan + Michael Ritter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott A Green
39W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Michael McGowan
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
George Sybert
233W–163L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michael Ritter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Joseph Flynn
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Mullins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Shaun Edwards
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Remoll
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
James Appel
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
William Willard
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.