Teams

MAC Snow

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Tues

12 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesMarsh Baker / Chuck Snow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDylan Brod / Darrell Eakes vs Brent Belding / Jesse Pasco4-6, 2-6
2021-11-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarsh Baker / Michael Piland vs Scott Kim / Jason Voigt6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDylan Brod / Eric Spivack vs Scott Alabaster / Eric Hewitt6-3, 6-3
2021-10-19vs Raintree RaghavanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Michael Piland vs Brett Sinsabaugh / Luis Rodriguez-Miranda6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Abbott / Dylan Brod vs Madhav Kidambi / Lee Brooks7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarsh Baker / Chuck Snow vs Craig Morgan / Sung Kang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-09-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Marsh Baker vs Logan Gruhl / Stuart Fulcher2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDylan Brod / Darrell Eakes vs Matt Sebetic / Jeffrey Blasko6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-09-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarsh Baker / Chuck Snow vs Byron Holmes / David Lefkowitz6-3, 7-6
2021-09-14vs ACAC RichmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Piland / Marsh Baker vs Jason Voigt / Jeff Richman6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDylan Brod / Alex Abbott vs Jesse Smith / David Aschheim6-2, 6-2
2021-09-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Michael Piland vs Christopher Wade / Warren Smigo6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDylan Brod / Darrell Eakes vs Jay Blatt / Aris Bearse7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eric Spivack
published 4.5
4.25
Marsh Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Chuck Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Dylan Brod
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.90
Michael Piland
published
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.65
Juan Loza
published
3.63
Alex Abbott
published 4
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Kevin Cousins
published
Tom Rider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsh Baker + Chuck Snow4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Spivack
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Marsh Baker
62W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.25
4.5
Chuck Snow
172W–207L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Dylan Brod
163W–98L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
Michael Piland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.90
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Juan Loza
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Alex Abbott
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.