Teams

ACAC Richman

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Tues

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-11-02vs MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Kim / Jason Voigt vs Marsh Baker / Michael Piland1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJeff Richman / Jimmy Ghaphery vs Tommy Bader / Stuart Fulcher3-6, 1-6
2021-09-28vs Raintree RaghavanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Jason Voigt vs Luis Rodriguez-Miranda / Holland Gravely5-7, 3-6
2021-09-14vs MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Voigt / Jeff Richman vs Michael Piland / Marsh Baker1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Scott Kim vs Logan Gruhl / Albert Thomas0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Scott Kim
published
4.01
Jason Voigt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Jimmy Ghaphery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Alex Balas
published 4
3.67
Marc Oosterhuis
published
3.51
Jesse Smith
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.17
Joseph Cipolla
published
3.01
Brian Premock
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Voigt + Jimmy Ghaphery3841% games−8.4% vs expected
Scott Kim + Jason Voigt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Kim
4W–20L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Jason Voigt
75W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Jimmy Ghaphery
61W–90L career · 3 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Alex Balas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marc Oosterhuis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Jesse Smith
166W–117L career · 7 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Joseph Cipolla
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Brian Premock
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.