Teams

Magnolia Green Sebetic / Gruhl Dynasty Lives On

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Tues

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-14vs Avalon WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Tommy Bader vs Byron Holmes / Bradford Baylor7-5, 6-3
2021-10-26vs ACAC RichmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesTommy Bader / Stuart Fulcher vs Jeff Richman / Jimmy Ghaphery6-3, 6-1
2021-10-19vs Bon Air WadeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Raymond Kanyo vs Christopher Wade / Warren Smigo6-0, 6-1
2021-10-12vs Raintree RaghavanWon 10
W#1 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Tommy Bader vs Henry Wood / Holland Gravely6-4, 7-6
2021-09-28vs MAC SnowWon 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Stuart Fulcher vs Chuck Snow / Marsh Baker6-2, 6-1
2021-09-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Raymond Kanyo vs Cary Broocks / Tyler Crone6-2, 7-5
2021-09-07vs ACAC RichmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Albert Thomas vs Jimmy Ghaphery / Scott Kim6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Logan Gruhl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Drew Lineberger
published 4.5
4.23
Todd Prince
published
4.14
Stuart Fulcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Eric Estes
published 4.5
3.85
Tommy Bader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Matt Sebetic
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Jeff Kane
published
Raymond Kanyo
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart Fulcher + Tommy Bader7749% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Logan Gruhl
189W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Todd Prince
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Eric Estes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Tommy Bader
115W–144L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Matt Sebetic
158W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jeff Kane
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Raymond Kanyo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.