← Search

Zach Pettit

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 120W–65L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-17 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eleanor Gardner mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-11 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eleanor Gardner mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-08 · MAC Pettit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Barefoot mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-04 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eleanor Gardner mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-29 · MAC Pettit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanisha Moseley mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
Kevin Findley / Lisa Thompson
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Barefoot mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Jonathan Kim / Andrea Gevas
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Hambrick mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Hambrick mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Hambrick mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-2
W
2026-01-23 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Barefoot mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.7% of games
3.5
84.6%
33W–6L · 65.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
11W–22L · 39.5% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.9% of games
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.7% of games
8.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.6% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
14W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.5mixed
81%
17W–4L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal