Search

Tanisha Moseley

HENRICO, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
302 matches · 154W–148L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Tanisha Moseley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history302 matches
W
2026-08-24 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Belmont Moseley · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Dell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · Belmont Moseley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Dell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · Belmont Moseley · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Philathea Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Belmont Moseley · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Seidel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Samson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kim Smith / Miguel Romeromixed
2026-06-26 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Samson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Samson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
51.9%
56W–52L · 50.6% of games
4.5
25%
3W–9L · 41.1% of games
7.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 53.7% of games
8.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 44.7% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.5mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
46%
29W–34L · 48.3% of games
8.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova