← Search

Katie Hambrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 189W–65L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history254 matches
W
2026-07-13 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Reynal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Reynal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Reynal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Malheiros
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-29 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Reynal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanisha Moseley
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Messmer
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zach Pettit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · MAC - Hammers 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yong Ko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-07 · MAC - Hammers 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ryan Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · 7 MAC Hammers 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zach Pettit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 62.2% of games
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 59.6% of games
3.5
80.6%
29W–7L · 65.8% of games
4.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 55.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 69.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 64.6% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.4% of games
4.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 63.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 68.5% of games
6.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.7% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 61.9% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.5% of games
8.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
43 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert